Encroachment on B-Kharab Land: Key Judgment Every Property Owner Must Know.
6 Feb 2026The writ petitions were filed challenging action of BBMP alleging construction over a storm water drain and seeking protection from demolition –...
Search Results for "Building plan sanction"
387 result(s) found
Found 387 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications of Accused in Building Collapse Case — Prima Facie Case Made Out for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder. Court holds that contractual relationship or professional commitment is not a prerequisite for framing charges under Sections 304, 420, 465, 467, 468, 120-B, 471, 201, 337, 338 read with 34 IPC when there is sufficient material showing active participation or illegal omission.
13 Jun 2024The judgment arises from the collapse of a multi-storey building named 'Tariq Garden' in Mahad, Raigad on 24 August 2020, resulting in 16 deaths and s...
- 707
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging BBMP Property Tax Reassessment. Court upholds BBMP's power to revise property tax under Section 108A of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976, holding that the capital value method is valid and that reassessment does not require prior notice if done in accordance with law.
11 Dec 2023The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by property owners in Bengaluru challenging the reassessment of property tax by the Bruhath Bengal...
- 114
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Endorsement Denying Building License in Land Use Conversion Dispute — Mandamus Issued to Reconsider Application. Conversion of land from agricultural to non-agricultural use under Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 does not automatically entitle an applicant to a building license under the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976, but the authority must consider the application on merits without imposing extraneous conditions.
26 Oct 2023The petitioner, Mrs. Sunanda Narasegowda, owned a property in Mysuru that was originally agricultural land. She obtained conversion of the land to non...
- 114
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against High Court Order Protecting Open Spaces in JVPD Scheme. Layout Reservation of 1967 Prevails Over Development Plan of 1999 Under DCR.
17 Apr 2020The Supreme Court dismissed appeals against the Bombay High Court judgment that declared two plots in JVPD Scheme, Mumbai, as mandatory open spaces an...
- 225
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Resolution Professional in IBC Moratorium Dispute. Section 14(1)(d) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 prohibits owner from recovering property occupied by corporate debtor during moratorium, even under joint development agreement.
19 Feb 2020The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the interpretation of Section 14(1)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The appellant, Ra...
- 266
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows CMDA Appeal in Premium FSI Charges Dispute — Guideline Value Prevailing on Date of Approval Governs Levy. Builder's Application for Additional FSI Does Not Confer Right to Pre-Revised Rate.
11 Dec 2019The appellant, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA), challenged the judgment of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court which directe...
- 224
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Heritage Committee's Approval for Demolition of Heritage Building. Court holds that the Heritage Committee's decision is final and binding, and the petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness in the approval process.
5 May 2017The petitioners, Prakash V. Patel and Dilnar Jehanbux Chichgar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the ...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Municipal Corporation for Inordinate Delay in Granting Permission to Change Land Use from Railway Reservation to Amenities Under DC Regulations. Held that the Corporation's failure to decide the application within a reasonable time amounts to arbitrary exercise of power and violates Article 14 of the Constitution.
13 Mar 2014The petitioners, Wadhwa Residency Private Limited and Mr. Manohar M. Chhabria, owned a large plot of land in Vikhroli, Mumbai, which was designated as...
- 55
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Clause 10(a) of Appendix III under DCR 33(7) for Redevelopment of Cessed Properties. The Court held that the requirement of 70% consent of occupants is a reasonable restriction and not violative of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution.
20 Mar 2013The petitioners, M/s. J. Gala Enterprises and its partner, purchased a property in 1992 comprising cessed and non-cessed structures with about 220 fam...
- 89
