Search Results for "Bombay Shops and Establishments Act 1948"

69 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 69 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Reduction of Superannuation Age from 60 to 58 for Employees of Government Mining Corporation. State as Sole Shareholder Can Amend Service Rules Unilaterally Without Employee Consent.

The petitioners, employees of Maharashtra State Mining Corporation Ltd. (a Government company), challenged the State Government's decision to reduce t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs Under Essential Commodities Act for Non-Essential Commodities. Wheat and Rice Seized by Rationing Authorities Held Not Covered Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 or Control Orders.

The petitioners, including M/s. Ace International, Pankaj Pranjibhai Thakkar, and M/s. Metro International, filed three writ petitions challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Permission and Parking Agreement for Hotel Tunga Regency. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or public interest violation in the grant of development permission and leave and license agreement for public parking plot.

The petitioner, Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur, claiming to be a social activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by TPAs Challenging TDS Notices Under Section 194J of Income Tax Act. Payments to Hospitals by TPAs for Health Insurance Claims Are Not Subject to TDS as They Are Not Fees for Professional or Technical Services.

The petitioners, Dedicated Health Care Services TPA (India) Pvt. Ltd. and others, are Third Party Administrators (TPAs) registered with the Insurance ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reduction in Pay Scale as Punishment for Misconduct in Tata Memorial Hospital. Disciplinary action based on established misconduct and apology considered by employer.

The First Petitioner, Dr. Ganesh T. Panse, was employed as a Scientific Officer with the First Respondent, Tata Memorial Hospital. On 22nd September 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows ESI Corporation's Appeal Against Acquittal in Contribution Default Case. Principal Employer Status Established Under Section 2(17) of ESI Act Despite Lack of Documentary Proof.

The Employees' State Insurance Corporation (appellant) filed two criminal appeals against the acquittal of the respondents (M/s Universal Engineering ...