Search Results for "Bombay Lifts Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Bombay Lifts Act"

78 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 78 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction Permissions as Barred by Res Judicata and Laches. The Court held that the petitioners had previously litigated the same issues and obtained no relief, and the PIL was filed after substantial construction had already been completed.

8 Apr 2026

The Altamount Road Area Citizens Committee and another petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Order Rejecting Plaint in Suit for Injunction and Declaration — Dispute Over Common Passage in Residential Building. Court Holds That Disputed Passage Is Not an 'Open Space' Under MOFA Section 1A(e) and That the Suit Is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata.

23 Dec 2025

The appellants, Zenobia R. Poonawala and Rohinton Poonwala, are residents of Flat No.9 in Rutton Manor, a residential building in Colaba, Mumbai. They...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

12 Apr 2024

The State of Maharashtra, through the Anti Corruption Bureau, Bhandara, filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 29.11.2013 passed by the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 set aside as prosecution failed to prove last seen theory and recovery of weapon beyond reasonable doubt.

6 Oct 2020

The appeal arises from the conviction of Rajendra Eknath Apugade and Arjun Vasant Falake (original accused Nos. 1 and 2) by the Additional Sessions Ju...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Flat Purchase Dispute — Upholds Dismissal of Suit Challenging Additional Construction. Court holds that flat purchasers cannot enforce sanctioned layout plans against developer in absence of express contractual covenant or statutory obligation under Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

25 Jan 2019

The appellant, Shri Vitthal Laxman Patil, was a flat purchaser in a project called 'Kores Nakshatra' developed by Kores (India) Ltd. Real Estate Divis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Holds That Arbitral Tribunal Erred in Rejecting Claims Without Proper Consideration of Contractual Provisions and Evidence. The court found that the tribunal's interpretation of the price variation clause, extra items, and compensation for delay was perverse and contrary to the plain language of the contract, warranting interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Chenab Bridge Project Undertaking, a joint venture contractor, was awarded a construction contract by the respondent, Konkan Railway C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Public Servants in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

5 Mar 2018

The case involves two appeals against a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, Kashinath Vikramji Thorat (accused No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Petition in Development Dispute — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Possession. The court held that the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case for interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as the development agreement did not grant possession.

4 Mar 2016

The appellants, Prajita Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal against an order dated 14.01.2016 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Forest Plantation Embezzlement Case Due to Insufficient Evidence. Conviction under IPC Sections 409, 467, 468, 465, 471 and Prevention of Corruption Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove entrustment, forgery, or criminal misconduct beyond reasonable doubt.

30 Nov 2010

The appellants, Bhaskar Maruti Thube and Anant Chandrakant Sonavane, were original accused nos. 2 and 3 in Special Case No. 4 of 2003 before the Speci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Upholds Enhanced Compensation Under Section 28-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court holds that reference under Section 28-A(3) is maintainable even if the original award was not challenged by the claimant.

31 Aug 2005

The State of Goa, through the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Executive Engineer, filed a first appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisiti...

5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)