Search Results for "Bombay Agricultural Produce Market Act"

306 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 306 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Appeals by Appellant Challenging Land Acquisition for APMC Mega Market -- Acquisition Upheld Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Karnataka Amendment Act 33/1991

Appellant filed writ appeals against the dismissal of its writ petitions challenging land acquisition for an APMC Mega Market. The Trust owned lands i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Clarifies Legislative Competence on Alcohol Regulation: Potable vs Industrial Alcohol" "A landmark judgment addressing the scope of State and Union powers on regulating alcohol under the Indian Constitution."

The Supreme Court of India revisited the legislative competence concerning the regulation of alcohol under the Constitution. The court examined whethe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging APMC Election Without Inclusion of Gram-Panchayat Members in Voters' List. Election process of APMC Tumsar set aside for non-compliance with Section 11(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Act, 1963.

The petitioner, Sadashiv Shivaji Dhenge, was elected as Sarpanch of Gram-Panchayat Hardoli in 2017, which falls within the territorial jurisdiction of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Order of Secretary of Agriculture Produce Market Committee. Transfer Order Set Aside as Violative of Section 44(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 and Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Deorao S/o Bhujangrao Fuke, was serving as the Secretary of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC), Majalgaon, District Beed....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Enhanced Compensation for Acquired Orchard Land in Road Project. Compensation increased from Rs.25 to Rs.100 per square metre based on comparable sales and development potential under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves two first appeals and cross objections arising from the acquisition of land for the improvement and black topping of a road at Cotom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Enhanced Compensation for Land Acquired for Tillari Irrigation Project — Market Value Fixed at Rs. 200 per sqm Based on Comparable Sale Deed. Claimants' Appeal for Further Enhancement Dismissed as Reference Court's Deduction of 20% for Development Was Reasonable.

The judgment arises from two cross-appeals challenging the Award dated 15th September 2005 passed by the Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Acceptance of Nomination for APMC Election Due to Disqualification Under Section 16 of M.S. Act, 1960. Respondent No. 4 was disqualified as a defaulter of a cooperative society, yet nomination was improperly accepted.

The petitioners, Dinkar Uttamrao Patil and Pundlik Raoji Pawar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Market Committee's Challenge to Exemption of Oil Mills from Marketing Fee. Minister's Order Exempting Mills from Payment of Fee and Supervision Charges Upheld as Valid Exercise of Power Under Section 12 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963.

The Bombay Agricultural Produce Market Committee filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 8th December 1989 passed by the Minister for Co-oper...