Encroachment on B-Kharab Land: Key Judgment Every Property Owner Must Know.
6 Feb 2026The writ petitions were filed challenging action of BBMP alleging construction over a storm water drain and seeking protection from demolition –...
Search Results for "BDA Act, 1976"
116 result(s) found
Found 116 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Execution of Sale Deed by BDA — Petitioner Failed to Implead Necessary Party and Sought Relief Beyond Writ Jurisdiction. Execution of a decree is a civil court function, not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.
17 Mar 2023The petitioner, Joseph Raj, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the Bangalore Develop...
- 101
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes BDA's Demand for Stamp Duty on 'Donation' in Lease Deed — Word 'Donation' in Lease Context Held Not to Mean Gift but Premium or Consideration. The court applied the principle of contextual interpretation to hold that 'donation' in a lease deed executed by BDA was a premium for the lease, not a gift, and thus not subject to stamp duty.
3 Jan 2023The petitioner, Suchitra Cinema and Cultural Academy, a trust registered under the Indian Trusts Act, 1882, had entered into a lease agreement with th...
- 106
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds NGT Order Quashing Environmental Clearance for Peripheral Ring Road Due to Stale EIA Data. Primary Data Collected Over Three Years Before Submission Invalidates Clearance Under EIA Notification 2006.
17 Mar 2020The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) dated 8 February 2019 quashing the Environmental Clearance (EC) granted to the B...
- 209
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Validity of Acquisition for Bangalore Development Authority. Landowners' challenge to acquisition proceedings fails as court finds no violation of statutory provisions under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976.
5 Sep 2019The appellants, Sri A. Chandrashekar and Smt Kempamma, filed a writ appeal against the State of Karnataka and others, challenging the acquisition of t...
- 40
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Scheme Under Section 27 of BDA Act. Scheme Declared Lapsed Due to Non-Completion Within Time Limit.
11 Apr 2018The petitioner, Sri. S. Kaleel, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the J.P. Nagar...
- 47
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds BDA's Power to Allot Civic Amenity Site on Lease and Demand Lease Rentals Under Regulation 7.1(2) of Revised Master Plan 2015. Regulation 7.1(2) is not ultra vires the BDA Act or the Allotment Rules, 1989.
29 Jun 2015The petitioners, Annabel Builders Developers Private Limited and Westend Heights Condominium Apartment Owners Welfare Association, filed writ petition...
- 44
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging BDA Allotment of Site to Public Library Department — Allotment Upheld as Valid and Not Contrary to Law. The court held that the allotment of a civic amenity site for a public library is a lawful public purpose and the petitioner society had no locus standi to challenge the same.
9 Dec 2013The petitioner, MICO Employees' House Building Co-operative Society Limited, a registered co-operative society under the Karnataka Co-operative Societ...
- 56
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to BDA Site Cancellation Due to Misrepresentation and Delay. The court upheld the cancellation of a site allotted under the Economically Weaker Section category as the petitioner's family income exceeded the prescribed limit and the writ petition was filed after seven years.
4 Dec 2013The petitioner, Smt. A.N. Jayalakshmi, applied to the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) for allotment of a site under the Economically Weaker Sect...
- 57
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to BDA Scheme Non-Lapse and Government's Withdrawal Notification. Scheme Under BDA Act Does Not Lapse Automatically Under Section 27; Government's Power to Withdraw from Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Upheld.
3 Jan 2013The petitioner, Sri H. Krishna Reddy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the 'By...
- 30
