Search Results for "366A IPC"

70 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 70 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Abduction Case Under Section 366-A IPC Due to Lack of Proof of Minority and Absence of Allegation of Illicit Intercourse. Inconsistent Testimony of Victim and Failure to Establish Ingredients of Offence Lead to Acquittal.

The appeal arose from the order of the Revisional Court confirming the conviction and sentence of the appellant under Section 366-A of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Prosecutrix in POCSO Case, Sets Aside Acquittal of Accused for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor. Court holds that consent of a minor is irrelevant and the victim's testimony is credible despite minor inconsistencies.

The case arises from an appeal filed by the prosecutrix (victim) under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Challenging Transfer of Juvenile Case to Children's Court for Trial as Adult — Petitioner Failed to Show Error in Board's Assessment of Mental and Physical Capacity to Commit Heinous Offence.

The petitioner, H.S. Poornesh, was a child in conflict with law (CICWL) charged with offences under Sections 341, 376, 506, and 417 of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Age Discrepancy. Conviction for Kidnapping and Rape Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Age Not Proven Beyond Reasonable Doubt and Testimony Lacked Corroboration.

The appellant, Prakash s/o Bhairuram Dhari, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Nagpur in Special Child Cri. Case No. 37/2018 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Rape and Kidnapping Case Due to Unproven Age and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Sections 376, 363, 366 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Minority and Credible Evidence.

The case involves an appeal by Subhash Bharsakle and his mother Leelabai against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akot, in Sessions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Hostile Witness. Conviction Under Sections 365, 366, 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shaikh Mahemood Sk. Osman, was convicted by the IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No.35 of 1997 for offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony of Prosecutrix. Voluntary Accompaniment by Minor Girl Fails to Establish Enticement Under Section 363 IPC.

The appellant, Hemraj s/o Sampatrao Bhoyar, was convicted by the 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No. 163/1997 for the offence ...