Search Results for "recovery impermissible"

884 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 884 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine Due to Discrepancies in Evidence. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Execution of Agreement and Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, Jaspal Singh, entered into an Agreement to Sell dated 22.06.2003 with the respondent, Ashwani Kumar, for purchase of 12 marlas of land ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Between Husband and Wife — Sale Deed by Wife Upheld as Valid. The court held that a Hindu wife has an independent right to alienate her share of property and that a child marriage does not automatically invalidate a subsequent sale.

The respondent, Mallayya, filed a civil suit (O.S. No.127/1994) seeking a declaration that he was the owner of land bearing Survey No.94/2B measuring ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Impleadment of Promoter in Co-operative Dispute Under Section 94(3)(c) MCS Act. Co-operative Court's Power to Implead Parties Is Not Restricted to Persons Enumerated Under Section 91(1)(a) to (e) and Includes Necessary Parties for Effective Adjudication.

The petitioners, members of Bramha Suncity Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed Dispute No.106/2021 before the Co-operative Court under the Mahara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Trial Court Orders in Suit for Possession. Court upholds refusal to reject plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and appointment of commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC to identify suit property.

The petitioners, S. Ramaiah, S. Siddappa, and S. Nanjappa, claimed to be owners of agricultural lands measuring 7 acres and 10 guntas in Nagarbhavi vi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010028192013_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates TDS Obligations of Turf Clubs on Stake Money Payments to Horse Owners under Income Tax Act. Interpretation of Section 194B and CBDT Circulars Central to Dispute over Characterization of Stake Money as Winnings.

The case involved writ petitions filed by Bangalore Turf Club Limited, Mysore Race Club Limited, Karnataka Race Horse Owners Association, and an indiv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

The High Court of Karnataka Division Bench heard writ appeals against the order of the learned Single Judge in a service matter involving judicial officers. The appeals were filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging the order dated 27-09-2013 in WP Nos. 41684-691/2012.

These writ appeals, filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, arise from a common order dated 27-09-2013 passed by a learned Single...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Earnest Money by KSFC in E-Auction Under SARFAESI Act. Petitioner Claims Suppression of Pending Suit and Interim Order Affected Marketable Title, Rendering Auction Notification Fraudulent.

The petitioner, N. Lakshmana, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka seeking...