Search Results for "occupancy"

702 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 702 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Issues Rule and Hears Matter Finally in Writ Petition Challenging MSEDCL Communication. The Court Decides the Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution with Consent of Parties After Respondents Waive Service.

The petitioners, a private limited company and its shareholder, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Mutation Entry Orders in Land Dispute — Failure to Provide Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Mutation entries made without notice to petitioners set aside under Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

The petitioners, Damodar Vittal Kamath and others, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Impleading of Legal Representatives in Suit for Specific Performance. Order Allowing Substitution Under Order 22 CPC Upheld as Proper Exercise of Discretion.

The petitioners, who were not parties to the original suit, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Revision in Luxury Tax Case: Society Running Marriage Hall Not Liable for Luxury Tax on Rent Received. Karnataka Tax on Luxuries Act, 1979 does not apply to letting out of marriage hall for functions as it is not a 'luxury' provided to customers.

The petitioner, Sri Veerashaiva Sangha (R), is a society registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1961. Its only asset is a Kalyana ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Injunction Suit, Remands Case for Fresh Consideration on Possession and Title. Trial court's dismissal of suit and decree of counter claim set aside due to improper appreciation of evidence.

The appellant, P V Kamesh Kumar, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree d...