Search Results for "Regular Bail"

733 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 733 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Satish Ganpatrao Suryavanshi, was convicted by the Special Judge, Ichalkaranji, for offences under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted; failure to show loan in income tax returns does not invalidate legally enforceable debt.

The appellant, Pushpa Sanchalal Kothari, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the acquitt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Direct Theft and Procedural Lapses. Theft of Electricity Allegation Fails as Prosecution Did Not Prove That the Accused Was Directly Involved in the Theft or That the Meter Was Tampered With.

The appellant, Bhanudas Supadu Wani, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, in Special Case No. 11 of 2005 for theft of electric...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Appeal in Electricity Theft Case — Conviction Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence of Theft. Meter Found in Disconnected State and No Proof of Unauthorized Use of Electricity Under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The appellant, Santosh Datta Chitalkar, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, in Special Case No. 7 of 2005 for theft of electr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Doubtful Trap — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 not proved; complainant turned hostile; trap witness not independent.

The appellant, Manohar Bodade, was convicted by the Special Judge, Aurangabad in Special Case No. 01/1993 for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Discharge of Accused in Company Complaint Without Application or Hearing. Discharge of accused nos.2 to 5 under Companies Act, 1956 set aside for violating natural justice as no discharge application was filed and no opportunity was given to the complainant.

The appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 18th December 2009 of the learned Company Judge discharging accused nos.2 to 5 in Company Complaint...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ashanand Ramji Fulekar, was convicted by the 1st Additional Principal Judge and Special Judge (CBI) on 28.1.2009 for an offence punisha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Discharge Application in Murder Case — No Prima Facie Case for Discharge Under Section 227 CrPC. Applicant charged under Section 302 IPC for conspiracy to murder, evidence sufficient to frame charges.

The present criminal application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 challenges the order dated 11.03.2010 passed by the learned Ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 406 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dinesh s/o Bhagwan Bharwad, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shahada for offences under Sections 302, 201 and 406 of the...