Search Results for "deficit amount"

776 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 776 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Enhances Compensation for Truck Damage Based on Survey Report. Survey Report Estimating Repair Costs at Rs. 1,90,490.50/- Accepted as Uncontroverted Evidence Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Bhaskar Shankar Jagtap, owned a truck bearing registration No. MH-19-Z-1392. On 02/10/2006, while the truck was proceeding towards Mumb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Charter Party Dispute Over Detention Charges. Arbitration agreement held valid and arbitrable despite respondent's objections regarding limitation and non-signing of charter party.

The applicant, Alliance Import and Export, a partnership firm, filed two arbitration applications under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Negligence Apportionment Set Aside and Compensation Enhanced. Deceased's income assessed at Rs. 15,000 per month with 25% future prospects and multiplier of 14 applied under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellants, original claimants in a motor accident claim petition, filed an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for 85% Permanent Disability in Motor Accident Claim - Claimant's Right Leg Amputated and Fingers Lost, Tribunal's Award of Rs. 3.5 Lakh Held Inadequate, Enhanced to Rs. 10 Lakh with Interest.

The appellant, Sanjay s/o Pandit Kharat, a 31-year-old mason, filed a claim under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, for injuries sustained in a motor acci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Exclusion of Counterclaim for Want of Pecuniary Jurisdiction Does Not Bar Subsequent Suit for Specific Performance.

The applicant, Sainath Jadhav, filed Regular Civil Suit No.731 of 2007 for injunction against the respondent, Shankar Jadhav, regarding agricultural l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Appeal for Return of Stridhan Under Section 27 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Husband Liable for Ornaments and Articles. The court held that the husband is presumed to be in possession of the wife's stridhan and must return it unless he proves otherwise.

The appellant wife, Sangeeta B. Kadam, filed a Family Court Appeal challenging the judgment and order dated 11th June 2001 passed by the Family Court ...