Search Results for "Section 498 IPC"

862 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 862 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Accused in Triple Murder Case — Circumstantial Evidence and Motive Establish Guilt. Accused Raju Birha Convicted Under Section 302 IPC for Murder of Three Persons, Death Penalty Upheld as Rarest of Rare Case.

The case pertains to the conviction of Raju Birha for the murder of three persons, Sunil Kotangale, Kailash Bahadure, and Golu @ Ashish Gaikwad, under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. The court held that the trial court's acquittal was not perverse as the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt under Section 302 read with 34 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 07.01.1998 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay in Sessions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Dowry. Conviction under Sections 304B and 498A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the deceased was subjected to cruelty or harassment for dowry soon before her death.

The appellant, Motiram s/o Kisan Shende, was convicted by the 1st Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara, for offences under Sections 304B, 306, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dowry Death Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Demand of Dowry and Harassment. Evidence of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration Lead to Acquittal Under Sections 304-B, 498-A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 27.08.2001 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar in Sessions Case...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 53-A CrPC for Medical Examination of Accused in Rape Cases. Challenge to police notice for medical examination dismissed as Section 53-A is not violative of Article 20(3) or Article 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Shreemad Jagadguru Shankaracharya Shree Shree Raghaveshwara Bharati Swamiji, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Section 498A IPC Case Based on Compromise Between Spouses. Conviction and Sentence Set Aside Following Settlement, Relying on B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana.

The applicant, Fakira Shamrao Sormare, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jafarabad, in RCC No.73/2004 for the offence punishable u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Dowry Prohibition Act Case Due to Settlement Between Parties. Criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act quashed as continuation would be futile after amicable settlement.

The petitioners, who are the husband and his relatives, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Absence of Prima Facie Case. Allegations of Dowry Demand and Cruelty Under Sections 304-B, 498-A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act Fail as Complainant's Own Witnesses Turned Hostile and No Credible Material Existed.

The applicants, Wajidulla s/o Ibadulla, Javedullakhan s/o Ibadulla Khan, and Ahemadibegum d/o Subhankhan, filed an application under Section 482 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Criminal Complaints for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC — Directors of Government Company Held to be Public Servants. Prosecution under Section 138 NI Act Without Prior Sanction is Not Maintainable.

The petitioners, M/s. Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Vasantram Metha & Company Pvt. Ltd., filed criminal writ petitions under Article 226 of the...