Search Results for "Article 15(3)"

873 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 873 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Railway Protection Force Constable for Gross Neglect of Duty and Abuse of Authority. High Court's Reinstatement Order Set Aside for Exceeding Writ Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence.

The case arose from disciplinary proceedings against Rajendra Kumar Dubey, a Constable in the Railway Protection Force (RPF), who was charged with gro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Taxpayer Against Non-Processing of Income Tax Returns and Refund Claims. Mandamus Issued to Process Returns Under Section 143(1) Within Four Weeks, Subject to Section 143(1D) and Section 241A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Vodafone Idea Ltd. (formerly Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd), is a telecommunications company that filed income tax returns for Assessmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.1807 OF 2024

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Mesne Profits Award in Landlord-Tenant Dispute — Rate Fixed at Rs.1,24,099 per Month Based on Expert Evidence. Court Confirms That Mesne Profits Are Determined by Market Rent, Not Controlled Rent, and Interest at 6% p.a. Is Appropriate.

The case involves a dispute between Bata India Limited (the applicant/tenant) and Bindiya Co-operative Housing Society Limited (the respondent/landlor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder of Wife Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Extra-Judicial Confession. The court confirmed life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC as the chain of circumstances was complete and motive established.

The appellant, Vishal Budhanand Thorat, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Latur, for the murder of his wife, Neelam, under Section 302 of the India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Activist in UAPA Case for Failure to File Charge Sheet Within 90 Days. The court held that the right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC is indefeasible and the period of house arrest cannot be excluded from the computation of the 90-day period.

The appellant, Gautam P. Navlakha, a 69-year-old scholar, writer, and civil rights activist, was arrested on 28/10/2018 in connection with FIR No. 4 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 17-A of Prevention of Corruption Act. Amendment requiring prior approval for investigation applies to chargesheets filed after its commencement.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau, Nagpur, filed a criminal application challenging an ord...