Search Results for "block development officer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "block development officer"

1305 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1305 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partly Allows GMADA's Appeal in Consumer Case; Sets Aside Additional Loan Interest Award. Refund of Flat Purchase Amount with 8% Compound Interest Upheld as per Letter of Intent, but Directing Developer to Pay Interest on Home Loan Not Justified.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose from a residential scheme launched by Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA) for 'Purab Premium Apartments' in Sector 88,...

High Court

High Court Directs BBMP to Consider Apartment Owners' Complaint Against Building Licence Granted Over Common Amenity Area. Undivided Share in Entire Property Conveyed by Sale Deeds Includes Land Reserved for RWHU and STP; Builder Cannot Unilaterally Alter Approved Plan.

25 Apr 2025

The petitioner, Keerthi Harmony Apartment Owners Association, challenged a building licence granted by the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Allotment of Land to Third Party in IT Park — No Legitimate Expectation or Right to Specific Performance of MOU for Land Allotment. The court held that the MOU was not a concluded contract and the petitioners' remedy lay in civil court, not writ jurisdiction.

11 Feb 2010

The petitioners, Patni Computers Systems Ltd and its director Sitaram R. Tiwari, filed a writ petition challenging the decision of the Maharashtra Ind...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch — Procedural Irregularities Not Sufficient to Invalidate Motion Passed by Majority. The court held that the no-confidence motion passed by a majority of 9 out of 13 members was valid under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, and the alleged procedural irregularities did not vitiate the motion.

22 Nov 2016

The petitioners, 13 ex-members of the Grampanchayat of Rukadi, filed a writ petition challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Challenge to Solid Waste Management Tender; Petitioners Allege Clubbing of Wards Renders Small Contractors Ineligible. Case Raises Issues of Arbitrariness, Transparency, and Compliance with Ministry of Urban Development Manual Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

3 Nov 2025

The dispute arose from a tender notification dated 30.07.2025 issued by the Bengaluru Solid Waste Management Limited (BSWML) for 33 packages covering ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Issues Directions in PIL Regarding Encroachment of Public Streets and Footpaths by Religious Pandals and Street Vendors. The Court Clarified That the Grant of Temporary Construction Licences Under Section 288(2) of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976, Does Not Empower BBMP to Authorize Structures That Obstruct Public Passage.

27 Sep 2019

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a Public Interest Litigation filed by a resident of Thyagarajanagar, Bengaluru, who appeared in person....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Primary School — Resolution to Abandon Acquisition of Adjoining Land Does Not Extend to Petitioner's Land. The court held that a Municipal Council's resolution to abandon acquisition of Survey No. 34/1 and demand refund of the entire amount does not imply abandonment of acquisition of Survey No. 34/3, as the resolution specifically mentions only Survey No. 34/1.

17 Oct 2011

The petitioners, owners of Survey No. 34/3 in Chandrapur, challenged the acquisition of their land under Section 126 of the Maharashtra Regional & Tow...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences in Service Matter — Retirement Age Enhancement Not Applicable to Autonomous Body Employees. The Court held that the Cabinet decision to enhance superannuation age to 65 years for AYUSH doctors was limited to those directly under the Ministry of AYUSH and CGHS, and did not extend to employees of autonomous bodies like CCRAS.

1 Jan 2023

The case involves an appeal by the Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences (CCRAS) and its Director General against the judgment of the Ori...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.

1 Jan 1970

The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Landlord-Tenant Dispute Over Eviction and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Subletting and Unauthorized Construction Upheld Under Section 100 CPC.

19 Mar 2019

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants (tenants) against the concurrent decrees of eviction and mesne profits passed by th...

61 62 63 64 65

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)