Search Results for "Article 227 CPC"

870 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 870 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Amendment Application in Partition Suit. Amendment Sought After Commencement of Trial Not Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC Due to Lack of Due Diligence.

The petitioners, Hemlata Harish Bhatia and Bharat Vallabhdas Bhatia, filed a suit for partition in 2004 against the respondents, Vallabhdas Lalchand D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Dismissal of Arbitration Suit for Non-Compliance of Court Order. Petitioner Failed to Pay Costs as Directed, Leading to Dismissal Under Order IX Rule 8 CPC.

The petitioner, M/s Crompton Greaves Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Eviction Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review of judgment dated 21.10.2010 in Writ Petition No.711/2010 rejected as applicants sought re-argument of merits, not review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

The applicants, tenants Shrichand s/o Rochaldas Khemani and Kawarlal s/o Rochaldas Khemani, filed a review application before the Bombay High Court, N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Dismissal of Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Recovery Suit — Service of Summons Held Valid Despite Defendant's Absence in Kuwait.

The petitioner, Jose Sarat Paes, challenged the judgment and order dated 23/3/2010 passed by the Adhoc Additional District Judge-2, FTC II, Margao in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Maintenance to Wife Despite Husband's Claim of Talaq in Restitution of Conjugal Rights Proceedings. Mere assertion of divorce does not defeat wife's claim for interim maintenance; husband must prove factum of divorce.

The petitioner-husband and respondent-wife were married on 22.12.2006 under Islamic Law. The wife filed Petition No. A889/2008 before Family Court No....