Search Results for "Project affected persons"

608 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 608 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Commercial Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC — Suit for Specific Performance Not Barred by Limitation as Cause of Action Arose from Refusal to Execute Sale Deed in 2018.

The appellants, Sri K.T. Govinde Gowda and Smt. G. Anuradha, filed a Commercial Appeal under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records — Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Are Only for Fiscal Purposes Under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioners, Shree Sai Reality, Shree Sai Infratech, and Shree Sai Buildtech, through their partner Sandeep Dindyal Aagarval, filed a writ petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reservation for In-service Candidates in Postgraduate Medical Courses — State Government's Policy of Granting Weightage to In-service Candidates for 50% of Seats in Government Medical Colleges Held Valid and Not Violative of Article 14 or 16 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, who were candidates for admission to postgraduate medical courses in Maharashtra, challenged the State Government's policy of grantin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Perjury Proceedings in Civil Suit Dispute. Alleged False Affidavit and Fabricated Documents Not Material to Main Issue, No Prima Facie Case Under Section 340 CrPC.

The present civil application was filed by CTR Manufacturing Industries Limited (the applicant) in a disposed of appeal from order arising out of Spec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reduces Sentence in Rash Driving Case Due to Mitigating Circumstances — Concurrent Findings of Guilt Under Sections 279, 304-A, 337, 338 IPC and Section 184 MV Act Upheld but Sentence Modified to Period Already Undergone.

The applicant, Deepak Babusing Pardeshi, was convicted by the trial court and the appellate court for offences under Sections 279, 304-A, 337, 338 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Double Acquisition of Land in Land Acquisition Case — Acquisition Proceedings Quashed as Land Already Acquired Once and Partitioned Thereafter. Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Section 4(1) — Double acquisition of same land not permissible.

The petitioners, Devram Govind Gadge and Vitthal Govind Gadge, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition proceedings initiated by the Special ...