WRIT PETITION NO.2457 OF 2012
2 Apr 2013The Bombay High Court was seized with four writ petitions filed by various trade unions representing aircraft engineers, technical staff, and technici...
Search Results for "Belated Application"
1428 result(s) found
Found 1428 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Accused in Prevention of Corruption Act Case on Ground of Delay. Applying Guidelines from P. Ramachandra Rao v. State of Karnataka, Court Holds that Under Section 13(1)(e) Read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Delay Attributable to Accused Seeking Adjournments Does Not Constitute Violation of Article 21.
21 Dec 2010Background: Petitioner Reshma Singh, along with her mother, step-brother, and one Manjit Singh Khera (inspector), were accused in Special Case No. 39/...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Prevent Proforma Defendants from Leading Evidence in Eviction Suit — Interest Not Adverse Does Not Bar Evidence. The court held that the right to lead evidence is not dependent on the nature of interest but on the court's discretion and the necessity for just adjudication under the Presidency Small Causes Courts Act, 1882.
10 May 2024The petition challenges an order of the Small Causes Court at Mumbai rejecting the plaintiffs' application to prevent certain defendants (Defendant No...
- 423
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Order in Tax Assessment Writ Petition Due to Statutory Remedy Foreclosure. High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Entertaining Writ Petition After Statutory Appeal Was Dismissed as Time-Barred Under Section 31 of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005.
6 May 2020The dispute arose from a tax assessment order dated 21.6.2017 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes against the respondent, a regis...
- 306
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Patwari in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.
21 Mar 2024The appellant, Sanjay Ramdas Kalmegh, was a Patwari at Pimpri-Deshmukh, Maharashtra. The complainant, Raghunath Tandale, owned agricultural land and a...
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MRT Order Rejecting Revision in Tenancy Dispute — Tenant Status Not Established on Revenue Records. The court held that the burden of proof lies on the person claiming tenancy rights, and mere mutation entry without corroborative evidence is insufficient under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.
6 Jan 2023The petitioners, claiming to be tenants of agricultural land, challenged an order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) dated 09 December 2013, wh...
- 41
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Government Employees in SC/ST Atrocities Case — Allegations of Caste-Based Insults Found Prima Facie Not Made Out. Court Held That Mere Allegations Without Specific Utterances in Public View Do Not Attract Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
5 Apr 2019The judgment arises from three criminal appeals filed by government employees (Ratnakala Martandrao Mohite, Govind Pandit Chaudhary, and Dr. Swapnil V...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Arrest Order in Murder Case for Lack of Exceptional Circumstances — Section 46(4) CrPC Violated by Granting Permission to Arrest After Sunset Without Justification. The court held that the Magistrate's order granting permission to arrest after sunset must record exceptional circumstances, and a mere statement that the offence is serious is insufficient.
16 Aug 2019The applicant, Ankita Harinath Mishra, was accused of murder under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with the death of Nitya...
- 105
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to File Written Statement and Counterclaim Under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC — Petitioner Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Delay Beyond 90 Days. The court upheld the trial court's discretion in refusing to condone the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing the written statement, holding that the statutory period under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC cannot be extended beyond 90 days except in exceptional circumstances.
28 Aug 2019The petitioner, Vesta Building Products Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30 ...
- 94
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Customs for Demurrage Charges Due to Delay in Assessment. Customs Department Directed to Bear Warehousing Charges for Inordinate Delay in Finalising Assessment of Imported Goods.
28 Oct 2005The petitioner, Apollo Paper Mills Ltd., imported second-hand machinery from the UK in 1995 to set up a paper manufacturing unit in Gujarat, seeking c...
- 92
