Search Results for "workman director"

315 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 315 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Labour Court Order in Industrial Dispute — Matter Remanded for Fresh Adjudication on Merits. Failure to Provide Reasoned Decision and Non-Consideration of Evidence Constitutes Violation of Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Limited, challenged an order of the Labour Court, Nashik, dated 30 November 2024, which dismissed the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employee's Petition, Sets Aside Industrial Court's Order in Domestic Enquiry Case. Labour Court's Vitiation of Enquiry Upheld as Enquiry Officer's Findings Were Perverse for Lack of Evidence on Specific Charge.

The petitioner, Ravindra Bhimrao Patil, an employee of Jawahar Sahakari Sootgirni Ltd., was subjected to a domestic enquiry for allegedly instigating ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Industrial Court Order for Failure to Frame Preliminary Issue on Workman Status. Employer's Application to Decide Whether Complainant is a Workman Under MRTU & PULP Act Must Be Considered as Preliminary Issue.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Rajya Kapus Utpadak Panan Mahasangh Marayadit, challenged the judgment and order dated 10th March 2010 passed by the learn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court's Declaration of Perverse Findings in Disciplinary Enquiry. Labour Court's Power to Reappreciate Evidence Under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Upheld Where Enquiry Findings Are Not Supported by Evidence.

The petitioner, Tata Infomedia Limited (formerly Tata Press Limited), challenged an order of the Labour Court at Mumbai dated 23rd October 2001. The L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Petitions Against Labour Court Awards in Retrenchment Compensation Cases. Held that Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not require a separate notice of retrenchment when the employee is already aware of the closure of the establishment.

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by the Municipal Council, Tirora, and its President against common orders passed by the Labour C...