Search Results for "witness summoning"

349 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 349 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction in Murder Conspiracy Case. Trial Court Convicted Accused for Murder of Sitting MLA Under Sections 302, 307, 120B IPC, but Accused Challenges Validity of Trial Based on Illegal Charge Sheet and Manipulated Evidence.

The accused No.6 (appellant) appealed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Petition to Quash Rape Charges Against Advocate Filed by Law Intern. Allegations of Sexual Harassment and Attempt to Rape Under IPC Sections 354 and 376 Examined, with Focus on Distinction Between Preparation and Attempt Under Section 511 IPC.

The case involved a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by an advocate, seeking to quash a charge sheet ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against High Court Order Summoning Additional Evidence in Asaram Bapu Conviction Case. Section 391 CrPC Cannot Be Used to Fill Gaps in Prosecution Case or to Introduce Evidence That Could Have Been Produced at Trial.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Rajasthan against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court dated 10.02.2022. The High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Accused to Adduce Defence Evidence in POCSO Case — Rejection of Plea by Trial Court Set Aside. Right to Fair Trial Under Section 482 CrPC Includes Opportunity to Present Defence Witnesses Even After Prosecution Evidence Closed.

The petitioner, Sri Periyaswamy M., filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) before the High Court o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in POCSO Case — Summoning Under Section 319 CrPC Set Aside for Lack of Strong Evidence. Identification of Accused Based on Spectacles and Subsequent Improvement in Victim's Statement Held Insufficient to Exercise Discretionary Power Under Section 319 CrPC.

The case involves an appeal against an order of the High Court of Uttarakhand upholding the summoning of the appellant under Section 319 of the Code o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Trial Court’s Order Allowing Prosecution to Examine Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC After Evidence Closure and Section 313 Examination

The case involved two Criminal Writ Petitions filed by accused persons challenging an order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, dated 27 Sep...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Summons to Chairman of Complainant Society as Defence Witness in Negotiable Instruments Act Case. Chairman Not Examined as Prosecution Witness, Hence No Bar to Summon Him as Defence Witness Under Section 243 CrPC.

The petitioner, Kalika Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit, a cooperative society, was the complainant in STC No. 531/2009 pending before the Judicial...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Summoning of Witness After Prosecution Closed Evidence in Murder Trial. Court holds that summoning a witness after closure of evidence and examination of accused under Section 313 CrPC causes prejudice to accused.

The applicant, Chandrashekhar Vinayak Wargane, was the sole accused in Sessions Trial No. 32 of 2012 before the Sessions Court at Amravati for the mur...