Search Results for "wilful conduct"

493 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 493 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Abetment to Suicide Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Instigation. Conviction under Section 306 IPC Set Aside as Alleged Threat Did Not Constitute Abetment.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the conviction of the appellant under Section 306 IPC for abetment to suicide. The appellant was a former...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction Under Section 498A IPC for Lack of Evidence on Cruelty or Dowry Demand. High Court's finding of no mental cruelty for Section 306 IPC contradicted its own finding of dowry demand for Section 498A IPC without proper reasoning.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Wasim against the judgment of the High Court of Delhi which had upheld his conviction under Section 498A IPC w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Finds Reliance Companies Guilty of Contempt for Breach of Undertakings to Pay INR 550 Crore to Ericsson India Pvt. Ltd. The court held that the undertakings making payment conditional upon sale of assets were contrary to the court's order and constituted wilful disobedience.

The Supreme Court of India dealt with three contempt petitions filed by Ericsson India Pvt. Ltd. against Reliance Communications Ltd., Reliance Teleco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Contempt Appeal, Sets Aside Conviction for Willful Disobedience of Court Order in Land Dispute. Appellants Held Not Guilty of Contempt as Order Was Ambiguous and Compliance Was Not Willfully Disobeyed.

The case arises from a contempt appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, filed by Tejram, Laxman, and Ramu Hazare (appellants) aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeal by Subsequent Purchasers Against Decree of Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell. High Court's Ruling That Original Vendees Were Entitled to Specific Performance Despite Contract Termination and Subsequent Sale Is Under Review.

These appeals before the Supreme Court arose from a common judgment of the High Court of Karnataka which allowed two appeals filed by the original ven...