Search Results for "vitiates order"

751 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 751 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decision on Auction Sale: Statutory Violations Render Sale Null and Void. Despite recognizing significant procedural breaches, the Supreme Court offers the appellant a chance to retain the industrial property by settling liabilities.

The legality of an auction sale conducted by the Tahsildar and confirmed by the Additional Collector, which was later contested on the grounds of stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Reforms Case Upholding High Court's Remand Order. Fraud in Obtaining Occupancy Rights Under Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 Vitiates Proceedings, Justifying Remand for Fresh Disposal Despite Delay.

The appeals arose from a judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Writ Appeal No.1563 of 2007 connected with Writ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Procedural Lapses — Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Violated

The petitioner, father of the detenu, challenged the preventive detention order dated 17/10/2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in TADA Case Due to Non-Compliance of Section 20A(1) — Prior Approval of DSP Mandatory. The Court held that recording of information under TADA without prior approval of the District Superintendent of Police vitiates the entire proceedings, and the defect is not curable.

The appeal arose from an order of the Designated TADA Court dismissing the appellants' application for discharge on the ground of non-compliance with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Verification of In-Camera Statements. Failure to Verify Secret Statements Renders Subjective Satisfaction Invalid, Making Detention Order Unsustainable.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Dipak alias D. Baba Kashinath Kamble, challenged a detention order dated 7 August 2015 issued by the Commissione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated as Statements of Co-Accused Not Furnished.

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Burhan Fakhruddin Khatumdi, challenged a detention order dated 27.3.2015 passed by the Principal Secretar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Placement of Bail Order Before Detaining Authority. The court held that the bail order was a vital document and its non-consideration vitiated the subjective satisfaction under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, brother of the detinue, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the detention order dated 17th...