Search Results for "vendor purchaser contract"

305 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 305 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal, Upholds Specific Performance Decree for Oral Agreement to Sell Land. Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With as Plaintiff Proved Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

This second appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an oral agreement to sell agricultural land. The plaintiff (now represented by legal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Specific Performance Decree Based on Oral Agreement — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With in Second Appeal. Oral Agreement for Sale of Immovable Property Proved by Evidence; Written Document Dated 31.12.1973 Did Not Supersede Earlier Oral Agreement.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants challenging concurrent judgments and decrees passed for specific performance of an agreement...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Specific Performance Case — Buyer's Readiness and Williness Established. Time Held Not of Essence Due to Seller's Conduct in Accepting Delayed Payments and Continuing Negotiations.

The dispute arose from an agreement for sale of immovable property dated 20th January 2005 between the sellers (appellants in CA 3015/2013) and the bu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.

The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Reverses First Appellate Court's Dismissal on Limitation and Order II Rule 2 CPC. Time was not of essence of contract and suit was not barred by limitation or res judicata.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed Special Civil Suit No. 51 of 1989 for specific performance of an agreement to sell immovable property again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Judgment-Debtor's Petition Seeking Rescission of Contract Under Section 28 of Specific Relief Act — Decree-Holder's Failure to Deposit Balance Consideration Within Stipulated Time Gives Right to Rescission, Subsequent Deposit Does Not Extinguish That Right.

The petitioner, T.L. Rajagopal, was the defendant/judgment-debtor in a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 16.08.1997 filed by...