Search Results for "valuation and court fee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "valuation and court fee"

280 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 280 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC — Held That Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Court Fees Issue Was Curable. The Court restored the suit for trial, emphasizing that the High Court impermissibly conducted a mini-trial at the threshold stage.

21 Apr 2026

The appellant, M/s. Marg Limited, a real estate developer, purchased land in Chennai in 2002 and constructed a commercial IT building. In 2011 and 201...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Refers Non-Signatory to Arbitration Under Group of Companies Doctrine. The Court held that the referral court under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 must only examine the existence of an arbitration agreement on a prima facie basis, and the group of companies doctrine can bind a non-signatory to the arbitration agreement.

20 Sep 2024

The present petition was filed under Section 11(6) read with Section 11(9) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of a Sole...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Suit for Cancellation of Release Deed — Plaint Not Liable for Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC as Cause of Action Disclosed. Allegations of Fraud and Misrepresentation in Obtaining Release Deed Constitute a Valid Cause of Action, and the Court Cannot Look into Defense at the Stage of Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

23 Jun 2023

The case arises from a civil suit filed by the plaintiff (respondent herein) seeking cancellation of a registered release deed dated 01.07.2019, alleg...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Court Fee in Suit for Annulment of Compromise Decree. Court Fee Refund Granted Under Section 66(2)(a) of Karnataka Court Fee and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 When Compromise Decree Is Set Aside.

30 Jun 2021

The petitioners, L. Dayananda Reddy and Gayathri D., filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challengi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Order Directing Payment of Court Fee on Higher Valuation in Appeal. Court holds that valuation for court fee and jurisdiction are distinct, and appeal valuation is determined by the relief granted in the decree, not the market value of the property.

9 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Dr. Pramod Prakashchandra Banait, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28/07/2014 passed by the Appellate Court (District ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Trial Court's Valuation of Suit for Declaration and Injunction Under Karnataka Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act, 1958 — Suit for Declaration That Sale Deed Is Null and Void Is Properly Valued Under Section 26(c) Read with Section 24(d) of the Act.

24 Apr 2015

The defendant filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30.7.2013 passed by the I Addit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Suit for Specific Performance After Trial Commenced — Amendment Sought After Cross-Examination of Plaintiff's Witness Held Not Barred by Proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Trial Had Not Concluded and Amendment Was Necessary for Determining Real Controversy

25 Sep 2013

The petitioner, Walchandnagar Industries Limited, the original defendant No.1, challenged an order dated 28-11-2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation for Acquired House Based on Expert Evidence. Reference Court's award of Rs. 6 per sq. ft. for built-up area and Rs. 3 per sq. ft. for open space upheld as just and proper under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

7 Mar 2011

The appellant, Masaji s/o Gyanoji Thoke, owned and possessed House No. 133 in village Borja, Taluka Kalamnuri, District Parbhani. The house was acquir...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Valuation of Suit for Court Fees in Property Dispute. Court holds that where a sale deed is challenged as void ab initio, the plaintiff need not pay ad valorem court fees on the market value of the property, and the suit is properly valued under Section 6(iv)(j) of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959.

28 Sep 2010

The petitioner, original defendant No.1, challenged the valuation of the suit for the purpose of payment of court fees. The respondents, original plai...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Declaration and Injunction. Court holds that the trial court erred in rejecting the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC without considering the plaintiffs' claim of possession and the pending amendment application.

5 Feb 2010

The appellants, plaintiffs in Special Civil Suit No. 220/1993/A, filed a suit for declaration and injunction in 1993, claiming ownership and possessio...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)