Search Results for "unsecured creditor"

186 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 186 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Power Trust's Appeal Against CIRP Initiation for Appellant(s), Upholds NCLAT Order Admitting Section 7 IBC Application Due to Default and Non-Compliance with Restructuring Conditions

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal challenging the initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) against Hiranmaye Energy Ltd. under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Sales Tax Attachment Over Bank's Secured Assets Under SARFAESI Act — Priority of Secured Creditor Upheld. Section 26E of SARFAESI Act gives priority to secured creditors over crown debts, and attachment by sales tax authorities cannot defeat the bank's security interest.

The petitioner, Union Bank of India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash an attachment order dated 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditor's Appeal in Customs Duty Priority Dispute Over Wound-Up Company's Hypothecated Goods. Held that customs authorities do not have priority over secured creditors under Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 for sale of warehoused goods under Customs Act, 1962.

The appeal by Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) challenged the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court which held that customs authorities...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Senior Citizen Insolvents Under Section 38 of Presidency-Towns Insolvency Act — Assets Fully Administered and No Objection from Creditor. Insolvents Granted Discharge After 9 Years of Undischarged Insolvency, Relieved of Stigma and Disabilities.

The judgment concerns a discharge application filed by two insolvents, Lav Chadha and Naresh Chadha, who are senior citizens aged 65 and 61 respective...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case — Lack of Specific Allegations of Role in Day-to-Day Affairs. Directors Cannot Be Vicariously Liable Under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Averments of Their Involvement in Company's Business.

The petitioners, including a company and its directors, challenged the order issuing process under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable...