WRIT PETITION NO.477 OF 2025
4 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "unreasonable obstruction"
79 result(s) found
Found 79 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Direction in Retail Outlet Dealership Selection Case Due to Applicant's Error and Land Possession. The Court Found BPCL Obligated to Guide Applicants and Consider Reclassification Under Group 1 as the Respondent Had Suitable Land on the Relevant Date, Despite Mistakenly Indicating Group 2 in the Online Application.
2 Apr 2025The appeal arose from a dispute over the grant of a retail outlet dealership by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) to the respondent, who bel...
- 451
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Refers Matter to Larger Bench on Automatic Vacation of Stay Orders Under Article 142 of the Constitution. The Court expressed reservations about directions in Asian Resurfacing that interim stay orders automatically lapse after six months, holding that such automatic vacation without judicial application of mind could cause miscarriage of justice.
29 Feb 2024The Supreme Court, in a judgment authored by Justice Abhay S. Oka, addressed the correctness of directions issued in Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency ...
- 552
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petitions Challenging Minimum Wages Authority Orders — Petitioner Failed to Establish Jurisdictional Error or Violation of Natural Justice. The Court upheld the Authority's orders directing payment of minimum wages to contract labour under Section 20 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948.
7 Nov 2023The petitioner, A2Z Infraservices Ltd., filed four writ petitions (WP No. 972 of 2019, WP No. 973 of 2019, WP No. 974 of 2019, and WP No. 975 of 2019)...
- 97
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Tenants Challenging Redevelopment of Dilapidated Building. Tenants' objections under DCPR 2034 rejected as redevelopment was approved by majority and TAC.
4 May 2023The Bombay High Court dismissed seven writ petitions filed by tenants of a building named 'Haji Manzil' located in Bandra, Mumbai. The building, const...
- 36
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Unmarried Woman's Appeal for Pregnancy Termination Under Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 - Interprets Rule 3B to Include Unmarried Women for Termination Up to Twenty-Four Weeks Based on Injury to Mental Health. The Court held that exclusion of unmarried women from Rule 3B violates Article 14 and that reproductive autonomy under Article 21 extends to all women, requiring purposive interpretation of the Act.
29 Sep 2022The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court dated 15 July 2022, where the appellant, an unmarried woman, sought permission to terminate h...
- 231
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Compensation Enhanced for Widow and Children. Future Prospects and Loss of Consortium Granted Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
18 Jan 2021The appeal was filed by the claimants (widow, children, and parents of the deceased) against the judgment and award dated 3rd April 2018 in MACP No. 4...
- 37
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Reviews Its Own Guidelines on Arrest and Anticipatory Bail Under SC/ST Act. Directions Requiring Preliminary Enquiry and Approval for Arrest Quashed as Legislative Overreach, but Anticipatory Bail Direction Upheld.
1 Oct 2019The Union of India filed a review petition against the Supreme Court's judgment dated 20.3.2018 in Criminal Appeal No.416 of 2018, which had issued gu...
- 378
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Wife's Application to Stay UK Divorce Proceedings and Grant Anti-Suit Injunction. Court holds that Indian courts cannot restrain a party from pursuing divorce proceedings in a foreign court where the respondent is domiciled and the marriage was not consummated in India.
29 Jan 2019The plaintiff wife filed a Notice of Motion seeking an ex-parte ad-interim order to stay divorce proceedings initiated by the defendant husband in the...
- 100
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging One-Man Commission Report on Freedom Fighter Pension Claims — No Violation of Natural Justice Found. Petitioners failed to establish bias or procedural irregularity in the Commission's inquiry under the Freedom Fighters' Pension Scheme.
30 Nov -0001The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by Anandrao Sahebrao Thosar, Dadarao Sonaji Bhopale, and Vitthal Nivrutti Misal, all aged around 77-7...
- 79
