Search Results for "transfer premium"

319 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 319 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Rejection of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Suit Not Barred by Limitation Under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves an interim application filed by the defendants in a commercial suit for specific performance. The plaintiff, Rajdhani Textiles Pvt. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Public Parking Lot and FSI Computation in Mumbai Building Project. The Court held that construction of public parking lot above plinth level without valid commencement certificate was illegal, and remanded FSI computation issues for fresh consideration.

The case involves a dispute over the construction of a residential building and a public parking lot (PPL) by Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Ltd. (SRU...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Consumer Case Over Exim Policy Incentives. Exporter Not a Consumer as Government Does Not Render Service Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Ministry of Commerce against the order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Revision in Sales Tax Case — Transfer of Know-How Not a Sale. Brand Owner Exempt from Tax as No Manufacturing Activity Undertaken by Assessee Under Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.

The State of Karnataka filed revision petitions under Section 23(1) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, challenging an order of the Karnataka Appell...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Specific Performance Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's discretion to deny specific performance and award damages instead, finding no grounds for interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Rolta India Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 8th December, 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...