Search Results for "time-barred"

82 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 82 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Being Time-Barred — Notice Issued Under TOLA Held Invalid Due to Insufficient Surviving Time Between Issuance and 30.06.2021.

The petitioner, Hansaben Hasmukhbhai Gadhiya, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Being Time-Barred. TOLA Extension Cannot Revive Expired Limitation Period for AY 2016-2017.

The petitioner, Amrita Aditya Shah, filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 28.07.2022 issued under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award as Time-Barred Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Application for Correction of Clerical Error Does Not Extend Limitation Period for Challenging Award.

The petitioners, Dr. Writer's Food Products Pvt. Ltd. and two individuals, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition as Time-Barred Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Petition Filed Beyond Three-Month Limitation Period Plus 30-Day Condonation Window Without Sufficient Cause.

The petitioner, Logic Eastern India Private Limited, filed an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 34 Petition as Time-Barred, Confirms Arbitral Award. Limitation for Filing Section 34 Petition Runs from Date of Receipt of Award, Not from Date of Filing of Wrong Remedy.

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bomb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition as Time-Barred Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Petition Filed Beyond Three-Month Limitation Period Without Sufficient Cause for Delay.

The petitioner, M/s. Adityasai Cotspin Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in the Bombay High C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Leave to Appeal Against Acquittal as Time-Barred Under Section 378 CrPC. Limitation period for filing appeal against acquittal by State is 90 days from date of judgment; application filed after 1 year 3 months is barred by limitation.

The State of Maharashtra filed an application for leave to appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against an order dated 12t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Rejection of Plaint in Recovery Suit as Time-Barred Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Claim for Damages for Short Delivery of Goods Filed Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period Under Article 11 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appeal was filed by Reliance Industries Limited against the order of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panvel, dated 21/3/1998, rejecting the plai...