Search Results for "temporary embargo"

150 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 150 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Property Dispute — Award Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Reasons. Court holds that an arbitrator must provide reasoned findings and cannot rely on unsubstantiated claims without evidence.

The case involves two writ petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an arbitral award dated 30 June 2023 passed by a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows CIDCO's Petition, Quashes Industrial Court Order Directing Permanent Employment of Contractual Employee. Contractual Appointment with Breaks Does Not Automatically Confer Right to Permanency Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition filed by City Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. (CIDCO) challenging an order of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Intent to Humiliate. Allegations of Outraging Modesty and Trespass Found to be Civil Dispute Over Land, Not Attracting Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The case involves three criminal appeals filed by Parmeshwar Sitaram Rathod, Ranjit Balbhim Todkari, and Aappa @ Digambar Bhaskar Joshi against the or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010159832015_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — 'LIVE IN' Mark Found Deceptively Similar to 'LIVE-IN'. Phonetic and visual similarity between marks leads to injunction under Section 29(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Federal Brands Ltd., filed a trademark infringement and passing off suit against Levi Strauss India Pvt. Ltd. seeking a temporary injun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

APPEAL FROM ORDER No. 54 OF 2012

The matter involved two appeals from orders arising out of Special Civil Suit No.2/2012 pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Bicholim. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Food Safety Authority’s Advisories Allegedly Amending Regulations Without Statutory Power. Validity of Advisory Issued Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, Questioned as Ultra Vires Section 92 of the Act.

A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Vital Nutraceuticals Private Limited and the Indian Drug Manufacturers’ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Settlement in Industrial Dispute for Breach of Section 12 of Industrial Disputes Act and Rule 11 of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules. Settlement Dated 5.9.2008 Quashed as Void Ab Initio for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Conciliation Procedure.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a settlement dated 5.9.2008 arrived at in conciliation between NRC Limited (the company) and NRC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Enforcement of SDM's Order on Removal of Unauthorised Parking and Encroachments. Directs Authorities to Implement Order and Frame Guidelines to Ensure Free Traffic Movement Under Motor Vehicles Act and Municipal Laws.

The petitioners, residents of Chandrapur, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to ...