Search Results for "tainted currency"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "tainted currency"

281 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 281 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Decoy Trap Found Invalid Due to Lack of Prior Complaint and Independent Witnesses. The acquittal of a public servant under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was upheld as the prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

23 Mar 2026

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 25.04...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole interested witness's testimony lacked corroboration.

21 Jan 2026

The appellant, Pravinbhai Ambalal Shah, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge & Special Judge, Kheda at Nadiad in Special Case No. 5 ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

31 Aug 2024

The appellant, B.M. Venkatappa, a Second Division Assistant in the Office of the Director, Employees State Insurance, Bengaluru, was convicted by the ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Conviction Based on Sufficient Evidence of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe, Despite Hostile Witnesses, Upholds Trial Court Verdict.

21 Jul 2022

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, a Junior Training Officer in a Government ITI College, Saundatti, for demanding and accepting a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Bill Collector in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

9 Oct 2019

The appellant, Bhaskar Khashaba Yewle, was a Bill Collector in the office of Tahasildar Encroachment. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Greater B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

6 Jun 2019

The appellant, Aarif Ali Yusuf Ali Sayyad, was convicted by the Special Judge, Dhule, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Cor...

High Court

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

1 Mar 2018

The appellant, Uttam Ramaji Shere, was a public servant working with the Mahatma Fule Backward Development Corporation, Akola. He was convicted by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

25 Aug 2015

The appellant, Shashikant Piraji Sonawane, was convicted by the Special Judge for Greater Bombay under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

4 Oct 2013

The appellant, Eknath s/o Laxman Gaikwad, was a Lineman (Assistant Lineman) employed at the Fuse Call Centre of Maharashtra State Electricity Board (M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Head Constable in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

16 Jul 2012

The appellant, Wamanrao Pawar, a Head Constable, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati in Special Case No. 3 of 1989 for offences u...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)