Search Results for "surgeon liability"

140 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 140 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Permanent Disability and Loss of Income. The court enhanced compensation from Rs.1,10,000 to Rs.5,14,735 for injuries sustained in a head-on collision between a bus and a truck.

The appellant, Ranjit Arunkumar Jaiswal, was a 29-year-old businessman running a Funfair and Mini Bazar. On 15/11/1997, he was travelling in a luxury ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Motor Accident Victim Due to Inadequate Assessment of Loss of Future Earning Capacity. The court recalculated compensation using multiplier method based on 30% permanent disability and income of Rs.4,500 per month.

The appellant, Rajkumar, filed an appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the Fast...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Sets Aside MACT Dismissal for Failure to Prove Negligence. Claimant's evidence of rash driving by respondent motorcyclist found sufficient to establish negligence under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Mr. Sameer S. Desai, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Lack of Evidence on Income and Permanent Disability. Claimant Failed to Prove Income or Permanent Disability, Resulting in Reduction of Award from Rs.5,50,000 to Rs.1,00,000.

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 20.10.2003 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur in Claim Petition No.130/1992. The c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge Petition in Medical Negligence Case Under Section 304A IPC — Lack of Material to Show Rash or Negligent Act. Court holds that death during anaesthesia without evidence of gross negligence does not constitute culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

The petitioner, Dr. Suvarna Arjun Jaybhaye, a medical practitioner with an MBBS degree and a diploma in Anaesthesia, was the accused in S.C.C. No. 965...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Labour Court Order for Retrenchment Compensation Under Section 33(c)(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Employer Liable Despite Nationalization and Transfer of Undertaking.

The petitioner, Empress Mills (a unit of Maharashtra State Textile Corporation), challenged an order dated 14.12.1998 passed by the First Labour Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive of Illicit Relationship. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for killing deceased due to illicit relationship with his wife; conviction based on motive, last seen evidence, and recovery of weapon.

The appellant, Surendra Sribali Sahu, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Pramod Amrit Ram. The prosecution case was that the appell...