Search Results for "supplementary agreement"

448 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 448 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application Challenging Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC in Suit for Declaration and Specific Performance -- Applicant Application Rejected, Anil Hariprasad Jejani's Suit to Proceed

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench dismissed Civil Revision Application No.117 of 2025 filed by Ramesh Bhagirath Rander (applicant/d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Distribution Licensee Against Tariff Revision for Change in Law Under Electricity Act, 2003. Non-Allocation of Coal Linkage Despite Government Assurance Constitutes Change in Law Entitling Generating Company to Compensatory Tariff.

The case involves a dispute between Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (JVVNL), an electricity distribution licensee in Rajasthan, and Adani Power Raj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Arbitration Reference Dispute Over Lease Rent Sharing. Dispute Between Society and Members Arising from Development Agreements Falls Within Arbitration Clause 19 of Addendum.

The case involves a dispute between M/s Avinash Hitech City 2 Society and its members (appellants) and Boddu Manikya Malini and another (respondents) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiffs to Lead Rebuttal Evidence in Specific Performance Suit Under Order 18 Rule 3 CPC. Plaintiffs granted permission to rebut evidence on supplementary agreement disclosed during trial.

The plaintiffs, Usha D. Shah and another, filed two suits for specific performance of agreements for sale of flats, based on letters of allotment date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Competent Authority's Order for Possession Upheld Due to Non-Payment of Rent and Unauthorized Subletting.

The petitioner, AMI Merchandising Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the judgment and order dated 14/0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...