Search Results for "sunset"

129 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 129 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Constitutional Challenge to COFEPOSA Preventive Detention Powers for Foreign Exchange Violations. Petitioners Contend Absence of Penal Provisions Under FEMA Renders Section 3(1) Unconstitutional.

The writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed directly in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 3(1)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Modifies Forest Department Timing Restriction for Temple Access in Reserved Forest Area — Permits Night Stay for Religious Rituals. The court allowed the writ petition in part, directing modification of the timing condition to permit overnight stay for performing Nanda Deepa Pooja.

The petitioner, C. Easwaramoorthy, a devotee of Arulmigu Vellingiri Swayambhu Eeswaran, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Procedural Lapses and Lack of Incriminating Evidence. Court held that non-compliance with Section 52A of NDPS Act and absence of contraband recovery from accused Nos. 4, 5, and 6 entitled them to bail.

The Bombay High Court heard four bail applications arising from the same crime under the NDPS Act. The applicants were accused of involvement in a dru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court Order Quashing Proceedings in Murder Conspiracy Case — Prima Facie Case of Fabricated Alibi Established. Police Officers Allegedly Created Bogus Excise Case to Shield Murder Accused, High Court Erred in Quashing Under Section 482 CrPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the appellant, Om Prakash Yadav, against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court which had quashed cri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Hostile Witnesses and Lack of Evidence. Conviction Under Section 302 Indian Penal Code Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Death of Deceased and Complicity Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, allowed a criminal appeal filed by the accused-husband challenging his conviction under Section 302 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Awards Compensation to Victims of Meerut Fire Tragedy Due to State and Organizer Negligence. State and Organizers Held Jointly and Severally Liable for Deaths and Injuries from Fire at Victoria Park Exhibition Due to Failure to Obtain Permissions and Ensure Fire Safety.

The Supreme Court dealt with a writ petition filed by victims of a fire tragedy that occurred on April 10, 2006, at Victoria Park, Meerut, during the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42(2) of NDPS Act. Secret Information Not Sent to Superior Officer Renders Search Illegal and Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Majjidkha s/o Hanifkha Khan, was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur in Special Case No.10/2004 for an offence punishable under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Robbery and Arms Act Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 392, 506 IPC and Sections 25(1A), 27(1) Arms Act set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and no public witness was examined.

The appellant, Bhimaraya @ Bhimanna, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yadgir in Sessions Case No. 06/2012 for offences punishable under Sections 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Appellants in NDPS Case for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions. Conviction under Section 20(ii)(c) of NDPS Act, 1985 set aside as prosecution failed to comply with Sections 42 and 50 of the Act.

The appellants were convicted by the trial court under Section 20(ii)(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, for possession o...