Search Results for "stone injury"

435 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 435 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt in Homicide Alleged Under Sections 302, 201, 120B IPC.

The case pertains to the murder of Kiran Suryawanshi, who was married to accused No. 1 Monika. The prosecution alleged that Monika, along with accused...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape and Poisoning Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 376 and 328 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sheshappa Gowda, was convicted by the II Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore in Spl.Case No.4/2008...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Despite Insanity Plea — Bipolar Mood Disorder Not Proven to Cause Incapacity to Know Nature of Act. Section 84 IPC Exception Rejected as Appellant Failed to Establish Legal Insanity at Time of Offence.

The appellant, Sarjerao Rambhau Machale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune for murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative and evidence lacked corroboration.

The appellants, Annayappa @ Krishnappa and Babu, were convicted by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bangalore Rural, for the murder of Munir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Popat @ Bhujangrao Bhausaheb Mahurkar, Sou. Vandana Popat Mahurkar, and Kum. Meena Bhausaheb Mahurkar, were convicted by the V Ad-hoc ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused No.1 for Murder and Acquits Accused No.2 of Murder in Family Feud Case. Common Intention Not Established for Accused No.2 in Murder of Yashwant.

The case arises from a family feud over a thrashing machine installed by Baburao, father of the accused, which caused nuisance to other family members...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Robbery Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Appellants convicted under Sections 302 and 394 read with 34 IPC for killing a person over a petty sum of Rs. 50.

The case pertains to the murder of Bapu Rustum Salgar on 23 October 2004. The appellants, Sanjay and Anna Upadhe, were convicted by the Additional Ses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Under Sections 302, 392, 397 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Anant Chandru Wake, was convicted by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur on 30/7/1994 for the murder of Mangesh Sawant, a Fores...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Shahaji Ramchandra Girigosavi and another, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli in Sessions Case No. 72 of 1999 for...