Search Results for "stock witness"

409 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 409 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Gopal Shankarappa Rathod, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, for the murder of his wife Savita under Section 302 IPC and se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Deputy Commissioner of Excise in Corruption Case — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside due to unreliable trap witnesses and lack of corroboration.

The appellant, Shivananda Bankolli, was the Deputy Commissioner of Excise at Mysore. He was convicted by the Principal Sessions Judge & Special Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Robbery in Engineering Student's Death — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Appellant convicted under Sections 302, 397, and 201 IPC for murdering a friend during a robbery and causing disappearance of evidence.

The appellant, Shaikh Yasir Abdul Mugni, an engineering student, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik for the murder of Jamankumar M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Ashok Kamble on 1/11/2011. The prosecution alleged that the three appellants, along with a juvenile, attacked the d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Madhukar Nagnathrao Bandale, was a Junior Clerk in Upper Painganga Project, Sub-Division No.3, Isapur. The complainant, Ganpat Kasture ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Four Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Conviction under Sections 302, 326, 324 read with Section 34 IPC confirmed as prosecution proved chain of circumstances leading to the murder of the deceased.

The case involves four appellants who were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the murder of one person and causing injuries to othe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Insurance Dispute — Floater Policy Interpretation Upheld. Court remits issue of loss assessment for reconsideration under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s. Boghara Polyfab Private Limited, had obtained a Fire and Special Perils Policy from the respondent, National Insurance Company Li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found. Claimant's claim for refund of margin money and compensation for unauthorized trades upheld as arbitrator's findings of fact are final under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common arbitral award da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in MCOCA Case Due to Lack of Satisfactory Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under MCOCA and IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove unlawful assembly and common object beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to multiple criminal appeals arising from a single incident where a group of individuals allegedly formed an unlawful assembly a...