Search Results for "sexual intercourse"

873 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 873 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 506 Part II IPC. Conviction for Criminal Intimidation Upheld Despite Acquittal for Rape and Related Offences; Threat to Upload Bathing Video Constitutes Offence Under Part II Section 506 IPC.

The Supreme Court dismissed a criminal appeal challenging the conviction and sentence under Part II of Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Consent Proof. Conviction under Section 376(1) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Absence of Consent Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Chandrashekhar s/o Bhagwan Meshram, was convicted by the Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli, for an offence under Section 376...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support penetration.

The appellant, Siddharth @ Bollywood S/o Bapurao Meshram, was convicted by the Special Judge, Wardha for offences under Section 376(2)(i) and Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(2)(i) and 452 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as victim's evidence found untrustworthy and medical evidence inconclusive.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Kishore Vitthalrao Shendre for offences under Sections 376(2)(i) and 452 of the Indian Penal Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Considers Whether Evidence Proves Attempt to Rape or Outraging Modesty in Case Involving Mentally Retarded Victim

This criminal appeal challenged the judgment and order dated 27/01/2017 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar in Sessions Case No.219 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Based on False Promise of Marriage — Consent Not Vitiated as Relationship Was Consensual and Prolonged. Prosecutrix's Testimony Lacks Credibility Due to Inconsistencies and Delay in FIR; Conviction Under Section 376(1) IPC Set Aside.

The appellant, Anwar Khan Iqbal Khan, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the offence of rape under Section 376(1) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Age Below 18 Years and Relied on Contradictory Testimony.

The appellant, Asif s/o Jakir Pathan, was convicted by the Special Judge/Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Special Case (POCSO) No.173 of 2016 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Conduct. Conviction under Sections 366, 376(2)(f), 376(2)(n) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Conduct Inconsistent with Forcible Intercourse.

The appellant, Shailesh Mahadeo Lanjewar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur for offences under Sections 366, 376(2)(f) and 37...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Age Evidence and Consensual Relationship. Victim's Age Not Proved Below 18, and Sexual Intercourse Was Consensual, Leading to Acquittal Under Sections 363, 376 IPC and Section 3/4 POCSO Act.

The appellant, Yadav Chandoba Dawlekar, was convicted by the Special Judge/Additional Sessions Judge-4, Nanded, in Special Case (POCSO) No.19 of 2015 ...