Search Results for "seniority rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "seniority rules"

685 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 685 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Direct Recruit Assistant Engineers Challenging Seniority List Favoring Compassionate Appointees. Seniority Determination Under Rule 35 of Tamil Nadu State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1955 Must Comply with Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, Requiring Reconsideration to Balance Rights of Direct Recruits and Compassionate Appointees.

10 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from a seniority list published by the Tamil Nadu State authorities on 15th April 2004, ranking Assistant Engineers in the Tamil Nad...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Seniority Dispute for Headmaster Post Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act. Seniority Determined by Date of Appointment in Category, Not Date of Acquiring Higher Qualification.

9 Dec 2020

The case involves a dispute over seniority for promotion to the post of Headmaster in a private school in Maharashtra. The appellant, Madhavi, was app...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Quashing of Government Resolution on Seniority for SC/ST Promotions in Orissa Administrative Service. Catch-Up Rule Prevails Absent State Legislation Under Article 16(4A) After 85th Amendment.

17 Apr 2020

The case involves a dispute over seniority between general category officers and SC/ST officers in the Orissa Administrative Service. The respondent-w...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Direct Recruit Deputy Collectors and State of Uttarakhand in Seniority Dispute. Promotee Deputy Collectors Cannot Claim Seniority from Ad Hoc Appointment Date as Appointments Were Not in Accordance with Rules Under Uttaranchal Civil Services (Executive Branch) Rules, 2005.

14 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court heard a batch of civil appeals arising from a seniority dispute between direct recruit and promotee Deputy Collectors in the State o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Seniority Dispute of Absorbed Deputationist. Absorption on Own Request with Specific Conditions Precludes Claim for Seniority from Deputation Date.

5 Feb 2020

The case involves a dispute over seniority between the appellant, Govinda Chandra Tiria, and the respondent, Sibaji Charan Panda, both Lower Division ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in CRPF Seniority Dispute — Direct Recruits Rank Senior to Promotees. Date of Allotment to Units Constitutes Date of Appointment Under Rule 8(e) of CRPF Rules, 1955.

27 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court allowed appeals by direct recruit Sub Inspectors (General Duty) of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) and the Union of India ag...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Service Promotion Dispute — Continuous Service Under Recruitment Rules Must Be Actual Service, Not Deemed Date. The Court held that the deemed date of promotion under Seniority Rules cannot be treated as actual continuous service for eligibility under Recruitment Rules, quashing the promotion of Respondent No. 3 to Section Officer.

10 May 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Girish Kumar against the judgment of the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) which had upheld the promo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Reversion of Head Clerk to Senior Clerk. Reversion Upheld as Petitioner Was Junior to Respondent No. 5 and Appointment Was Subject to Seniority Determination Under Maharashtra University Act, 1994.

31 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Khalil Ahamad Khan, was employed as a Senior Clerk at Amolakchand Mahavidyalaya, Yavatmal. He was promoted to Head Clerk on 01.06.2006...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recovery of Excess Salary Paid to Employees Due to Wrong Fixation of Pay Scales. The Court held that recovery is permissible when the employee had knowledge of the error or when the mistake is a continuing wrong, and the principle of no recovery does not apply in such cases.

18 Jan 2019

The petitioners, 13 employees of Thane Municipal Corporation, filed a writ petition challenging the Corporation's decision to recover excess salary pa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for Seniority in CGHS Promotion Dispute. Seniority Determined by Date of Regular Appointment, Not Ad Hoc Promotion, Under Central Civil Services Rules.

17 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Arjun Sopan Gaikwad, was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk on 16 October 1978 and promoted to Upper Division Clerk on 9 April 1984. ...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)