Search Results for "second petition maintainability"

1720 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1720 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Anti-Dumping Duty Notifications as Belated and Misconceived. Refund Claim for Rs. 9.24 Crore Rejected Due to Delay and Laches, as Petition Filed After Six Years from Imposition of Duty.

The petitioner, Sansar Texturisers Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging two notifications dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation Cannot Override Statutory Acquisition Process. Industrial Development Constitutes Valid Public Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the Uttarakhand High Court dated 02.11.2018, which dismissed the appeals filed by the appellants (the Stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition by Father for Custody of Minor Child in International Parental Abduction Case. Court holds that habeas corpus is not maintainable when custody is with lawful guardian and child's welfare requires stability.

The petitioner, Khaled Kamal Hussein Mohamed Kassem, an Egyptian national, filed a habeas corpus petition seeking the production and custody of his mi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Bank's Petition Against Registrar's Refusal to Register Original Application in Debt Recovery Case. Registrar's Role is Ministerial and Cannot Decide Tenability Under Rule 5 of Debts Recovery Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1993.

The petitioner, Bank of India, a nationalized bank, had granted financial assistance to a limited company, with Ms. Avantika Chauhan as a guarantor. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Non-Signatories Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act. Third Parties Cannot Appeal Interim Arbitral Orders Absent Privity of Arbitration Agreement.

The dispute arose from arbitration proceedings between Excel Metal Processors Pvt. Ltd. (respondent no.1) and Shakti International Private Limited (re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment on Sanction of Scheme of Arrangement Amid BIFR Pendency. Maintainability Under Sections 391 and 394 of Companies Act, 1956 Against Overriding Effect of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Considered.

The petitioner, Ashok Organics Industries Ltd., incorporated in 1973, filed a petition under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking ...