Search Results for "school reopening"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "school reopening"

55 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 55 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review of order allowing impleadment of sister in partition suit rejected as preliminary decree not yet passed and impleadment does not affect finality of decree.

23 Jul 2026

The applicants, original petitioners in Writ Petition No.288/2024, filed a review application (Civil Application (Review) No.10/2026) before the Bomba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Invalid Caste Scrutiny Order in NEET Admission Case. Petitioner's Thakur Tribe Claim Validated Despite Scrutiny Committee's Adverse Finding Based on Affinity Test.

4 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Aditya Vishvanath Golwad, an 18-year-old student, applied for admission to the MBBS course under the Scheduled Tribe (ST) category, cl...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Civil Revision Petition for Abatement Due to Failure to Implead Legal Representatives of Deceased Respondent. Delay of 5637 days in seeking substitution not condoned as no sufficient cause shown, resulting in abatement of appeal against deceased respondent.

27 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Sri K.K. Monnappa, filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging an order dated ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Owners in TDR Dispute — Upholds Godrej & Boyce I and Holds 2016 Amendment Prospective. The Court ruled that the right to 100% TDR for constructing amenities vests upon surrender and development, and the 2016 amendment to Regulation 34 of DCR, 1991 cannot operate retrospectively to defeat that right.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from three judgments of the Bombay High Court concerning the entitlement of owners/l...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reopening of Evidence in NI Act Case — Trial Court Cannot Suo Motu Recall Witness Without Application Under Section 311 Cr.P.C. The court held that the power under Section 311 Cr.P.C. cannot be used to fill gaps in the prosecution case after the matter is set down for judgment.

29 Aug 2018

The petitioner, Vasantha Amin, was the accused in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, filed by the respondent, Shek...

4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)