Search Results for "revised gratuity scheme"

124 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 124 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Lumpsum Compensation to Part-time Sweeper with 41 Years of Service in Lieu of Regularization and Retiral Benefits. Court held that in absence of absorption policy and due to abolition of posts, lumpsum compensation of Rs.7,50,000 is appropriate in lieu of all service benefits.

The petitioner, Parasram Ranganath Gaikwad, worked as a Part-time Sweeper in the Veterinary Hospital of Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar, from 7 June 1983 u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Armed Forces Pension Case, Upholding Terminal Benefits for Resigning Officer. Late Entrant Eligibility Under Regulation 15 of Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961 Applied as Officer Commissioned at Age 39 and Served 15 Years Before Resignation.

The dispute arose from the Armed Forces Tribunal's order directing the Union of India to process terminal and pensionary benefits for a former Army Me...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Challenge to Continuation of Departmental Enquiry; Rules No Provision to Continue Enquiry After Superannuation. Employee Entitled to Full Retiral Benefits as MAIDC Rules Do Not Permit Post-Retirement Disciplinary Proceedings.

The petitioner, a former Regional Manager of the Maharashtra Agro Industries Development Corporation Limited (MAIDC), filed a writ petition seeking to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench Hears Reference on Pension Entitlement of Part-Time Lecturers Under Government Resolution, 21 July 1983. Interpretation of Whether the Resolution Excludes Part-Timers Who Work Full-Time Equivalent Across Two Different Managements is at Issue.

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by a part-time lecturer in Hindi who had rendered services in two different aided colleges and claimed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Retired Employees Seeking Pensionary Benefits Under Zilla Parishad and Jeevan Pradhikaran Rules. Court Holds That Prior Service as Daily Wagers Counts Towards Qualifying Service for Pension After Absorption.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by retired employees of the Zilla Parishad, Latur, and Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran. The petitione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Implementation of Pay Scales and Arrears for Employees of Private Polytechnic. State Obligated to Ensure Compliance with Government Resolutions for Aided Institutions.

The petitioners, employed as teaching and non-teaching staff of Satara Education Society, which runs Satara Polytechnic (Suman Dhekane Department of P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assistant Professor's Challenge to Superannuation at Age 60, Holds AICTE Retirement Age of 65 Applicable to Private Self-Finance Standalone Institution. Goa Institute of Management's Faculty Manual Fixing Retirement Age at 60 is Overridden by AICTE Regulations.

The petitioner, Dr. Vilasini Devi Nair, was appointed as an Assistant Professor at the Goa Institute of Management (GIM), a private self-finance stand...