Search Results for "recommendatory decision"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "recommendatory decision"

78 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 78 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Press Release on GST Classification of Hand Sanitisers as Disinfectants — Executive Cannot Pre-empt Quasi-Judicial Adjudication. Press Release dated 15.07.2020 directing classification of alcohol-based hand sanitisers as 'disinfectants' under GST held ultra vires and manifestly arbitrary for encroaching upon quasi-judicial functions.

11 Nov 2024

The petitioner, M/s Schulke India Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in trading of hand rubs/sanitisers and antiseptics, which it claims are used as pharmaceutical...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to GST Notification Extending Time Limit for Show Cause Notice. Notification No. 09/2023 held valid under Section 168A of CGST Act, 2017 as a legislative act not amenable to certiorari.

1 Oct 2024

The petitioner, M/s Sahaj Construction, a registered dealer under the GST laws, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Remission Policies Under Article 161 and CrPC in State Appeal. The Court held that constitutional remission powers under Article 161 of the Constitution prevail over statutory policies under Section 432 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and policies are statutory rules under the Prisons Act, 1894.

3 Aug 2021

The dispute arose from an order by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana regarding State Government policies on granting remission to prisoners. The Stat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Disability Certificate Issued by Medical Board in BEST Employee Case. The Court held that the employer cannot challenge the disability certificate without independent evidence, and the writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 is not maintainable.

12 Aug 2020

The petitioner, Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Insurance Dispute — Policy Exclusion for Wear and Tear Does Not Apply to Sudden Breakdown. The court held that the majority arbitrators' interpretation of the exclusion clause was plausible and not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Feb 2019

The petitioner, United Phosphorous Limited, purchased a Gas Turbine Engine from GE and obtained an Industrial All Risk Policy from the respondent, Uni...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MPSC's Challenge to MAT Orders Directing Recommendation of Candidates for Assistant Executive Engineer Posts. Candidates' Marks in Civil Engineering Paper Were Wrongly Reduced Due to Incorrect Answer Key, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

3 Jul 2018

The Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC) conducted a recruitment process for the post of Assistant Executive Engineer. The respondents, who we...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages. Termination of workman without compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 held illegal, and reinstatement with full back wages upheld.

15 Nov 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Carona Ltd., challenged the judgment and order of the Labour Court, Mumbai, dated 30th September 2016, in Reference (IDA) No. 156...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Heritage Committee's Approval for Demolition of Heritage Building. Court holds that the Heritage Committee's decision is final and binding, and the petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness in the approval process.

5 May 2017

The petitioners, Prakash V. Patel and Dilnar Jehanbux Chichgar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions by Automobile Dealers Challenging Labour Court Awards of Back Wages and Reinstatement. Retrenchment of Workmen Found Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

28 Oct 2016

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by various automobile dealership companies (petitioners) challenging common awards passed by the Lab...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Students to Continue B.Arch Course Despite Exceeding Stipulated Duration Under University Rules, Overriding Council of Architecture Regulations. University of Pune's Rules on Maximum Duration and ATKT Conditions Held Inconsistent with Council of Architecture Regulations, Which Are Binding Under Section 21 of the Architects Act, 1972.

10 Mar 2015

The Bombay High Court dealt with a group of writ petitions filed by students of the Bachelor of Architecture (B.Arch) course at the University of Pune...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)