Search Results for "re-conveyance deed"

83 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 83 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Mortgage by Conditional Sale Case — Transaction Held as Mortgage, Not Sale. Agreement to Reconvey on Repayment of Loan Within Ten Years Constituted Mortgage Under Section 58(c) of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The plaintiffs (respondents) filed a suit for redemption and possession of agricultural lands, claiming that the transaction dated 03.11.1973 was a mo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell, Upholds Refund of Earnest Money. Court finds that the plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform its part of the contract under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, M/s. Dreams Construction Private Limited, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a land admeasuring 1 Hector and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Repurchase Not Enforceable. Receipt for Reconveyance Does Not Constitute a Valid Contract for Sale Under Section 54 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and Suit Barred by Limitation.

The dispute pertains to a suit for specific performance of an alleged agreement to repurchase suit land. The plaintiff, Dattu Kadu Aher, originally mo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Specific Performance — Agreement to Sell Not Proved Due to Absence of Independent Witnesses and Discrepancies in Evidence.

The petitioner, Ashok Maruti Dake, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 15-06-1992 allegedly executed by the original d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Order in Property Dispute Due to Limitation. Delay of Over 3 Years in Challenging Ex-Parte Decree Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC Held Not Sufficiently Explained.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the Plaintiff/Applicant, Smt. Gopi, widow of Tarachand R. Advani, seeking to set aside an ex-parte order ...