Search Results for "rape charges"

544 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 544 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, P. Prakash, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Dharmapuri, under Section 6 of the Protection of Children fro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Procedural Defects and Insufficient Evidence - Fundamental Error in Framing Charge Under Deleted Provision and Inconsistent Testimony Fail to Sustain Conviction Under IPC

The High Court allowed the criminal appeal filed by Appellant against his conviction and life imprisonment under Section 376(3) of the Indian Penal Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC. Minor's Age Proved by School Leaving Certificate and Oral Evidence, Consent Irrelevant for Rape Under Indian Penal Code.

The case arose from a criminal appeal filed by the appellant-accused challenging his conviction and sentence for offences under Sections 363, 366, and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State Appeal Against Inadequate Sentence in Child Rape Case — Sentence Enhanced from 2 to 7 Years. Court held that two years RI for attempt to rape a 7-year-old child was grossly inadequate under Section 376 read with Section 511 IPC and Section 8(2) of Goa Children's Act, 2003.

The State of Goa appealed under Section 377 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order dated 5th December 2008 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delay in FIR. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ganesh Laxman Korde, was convicted by the learned Special Judge, Ambajogai, in Special Case No. 2 of 2007 for offences under Sections 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 376(2)(f) of IPC. Appellant Contends That Evidence Only Proves Attempt to Rape, Not Penetration, Challenging Conviction for Rape of a Minor Below 12 Years.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant for the rape of a ten-year-old girl under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian Penal Code. On Novembe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and IPC Rape Case Due to Unproven Minority Status and Negative DNA Evidence - Benefit of Doubt Granted

The appellant was convicted by the Trial Court for offences under IPC and POCSO Act for allegedly having forcible sexual intercourse with a minor vict...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Delay in FIR and Lack of Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 376 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ningappa S/o Basappa Cheliwadi, was convicted by the III Additional Sessions Judge, Gulbarga, in SC 125/2009 for the offence of rape un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Material Contradictions and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Udaykumar Kisan Velonde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No. 210 of 2011 for offences ...