Search Results for "raiding party"

392 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 392 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Evidence. Demand for Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Special Judge, Kolhapur, acquitting the respondent Sikandar Khutubuddin Mujawar of charg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance of Section 50 — Search of Bag Not Covered Under Mandatory Procedure. The court held that Section 50 of the NDPS Act applies only to personal search, not to search of a bag, and thus the conviction was set aside.

The appellants, Rehanabi Sheikh Atiq and Sheikh Sohel Sheikh Atiq, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in Special (NDPS) Case 2/20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Vitiated Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 found to be without application of mind, and prosecution evidence on demand and acceptance of bribe was mutually inconsistent.

The appellant, Ravindra s/o Marotrao Thakre, was convicted by the Special Court under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for offences under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Other Mandatory Provisions. Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Search Illegal and Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellants, Raju Dhanju Rathod and Ramesh Liganna Mudraj, were convicted by the Special Court for NDPS, Bombay, for offences under Section 20(c) r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Evidence of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Sections 7, 12, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ramdas Waman Tadge, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, in Special (A.C.B.) Case No. 01 of 2008 for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent, Prabhakar Uddarwar, who was a Nazul Surveyor in the office of Taluka Inspec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Sub-Inspector and Private Individual in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was a stock witness and evidence lacked corroboration.

The appellants, Jawansingh Ramsingh Gaud (a Sub-Inspector of Police) and Umesh Manohar Ambre (a private individual), were convicted by the Special Jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shashikant Piraji Sonawane, was convicted by the Special Judge for Greater Bombay under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ramesh Sonawane, was an Assistant Sub-Inspector at a police chowki in Government Medical College Hospital, Aurangabad. He was convicted...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 5(1)(d) read with Section 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and Section 161 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, in Special Case No.2/88, acquitting the respondent-ac...