Search Results for "quasi-judicial tribunal"

105 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 105 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Correction of Clerical Error in MACT Judgment — Mistake in Identifying Driver as Owner of Vehicle. Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Tribunal's refusal to correct error set aside; liability shifted to insurance company.

The petitioners, original respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in a Motor Accident Claim Petition, challenged an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Challenging Ceiling Proceedings: Collusive Partition Decree Not Binding on State. Findings of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands Ceiling Authorities, Confirmed by Supreme Court, Held Binding on Plaintiff Despite Alleged Family Arrangement.

Background: The litigation originated from a dispute over agricultural land declared surplus under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Hold...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal and Remands Eviction Case to High Court for Fresh Disposal Due to Unreasoned Order. High Court's Dismissal of Writ Petition Set Aside for Lack of Discussion and Reasons, Emphasizing Requirement of Reasoned Orders.

The appellant, Kushuma Devi, filed an eviction petition against the respondents, which was decreed by the Civil Judge on 19.04.1996. The respondents a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Reference of Industrial Dispute in Employer-Employee Relationship Case. Failure Report by Conciliation Officer Sufficient to Show Existence of Dispute Under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Rajesh Binkar, filed a writ petition against the Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Labour, and the New India Assurance Co. L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Gram Panchayat Employee Challenging Dismissal for Indecent Behaviour. Termination Order Upheld as Gram Panchayat Had Power to Dismiss Under Section 61(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Procedure of Natural Justice Was Followed.

The petitioner, Ashok Govindrao Sardar, was appointed as a Water Supply employee of Gram Panchayat Pimpalkhuta on 31 January 1986. On 12 December 2012...