Search Results for "prosecution failure"

3507 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3507 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Abduction, Murder, Robbery, and Conspiracy. The Appellants Contended That Lodging Two FIRs for the Same Transaction Vitiated the Trial and That Circumstantial Evidence Was Insufficient.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard four criminal appeals against a common judgment of the Sessions Court in Sessions Case No. 50/2009, which convic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Hariomdas Govinddas Bainade, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for offences punishable under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Conviction Set Aside Due to Gaps in Chain of Circumstances. Failure to Prove Motive and Last Seen Theory Beyond Reasonable Doubt Leads to Benefit of Doubt Under Indian Penal Code, 1860 Sections 302, 201, 120B.

The appellant, Vrishal Madhukar Kalane, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 302, 201, and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the mur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Failure to Record Reasons for Belief and Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Mohd. Akram Mohd. Majij Shaikh, was convicted under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) by the Special ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under IPC and POCSO Act — Appellant Argues Contradictions in Evidence and Political Rivalry

The case arose from an incident on 19.11.2014 where a minor girl aged 16 years was allegedly abducted by three accused in a white Omni car. According ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Adjudicates Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act for Alleged Disproportionate Assets. Appellants Challenged Conviction on Grounds of Procedural Irregularities and Erroneous Calculation of Assets.

The criminal appeal before the Madras High Court arises from a conviction by the Special Judge for CBI Cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Appeals Against Conviction for Murder and State's Appeal for Fine. Case Involves Issues of Identity, Motive, and Recovery Under Sections 302 and 34 IPC.

The appeals arose from the judgment of the Fast Track (Sessions) Judge-V, Bengaluru City, in S.C. No. 1199/2012, convicting the accused under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault of Minor Set Aside as Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Evidence and Other Witnesses.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under POCSO Act and IPC for alleged aggravated penetrative sexual assault of a 6-year-old girl. The vic...