Search Results for "proposed cooperative society"

396 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 396 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cooperative Society Registration — Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi as Non-Member. Registration of Dayal Smruti Cooperative Housing Society under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 upheld as petitioner was not a member and had no right to object.

The petitioner, Rachana Developers, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Stay on Appointment of Special Auditor Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. Order under Section 81(3)(c) for Test Audit Held Administrative, Not Quasi-Judicial, Hence Revision Under Section 154 Not Maintainable.

The petitioners, complainants, sought a test audit of respondent No.6 society under Section 81(3)(c) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 196...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order in Cooperative Society Dispute — Revision Under Section 154 of MCS Act Allowed Without Proper Hearing. Minister's order set aside for non-compliance with principles of natural justice and failure to consider relevant material.

The petitioner, Pandurang Tukaram Thakre, claiming to be a member of respondent no. 4 cooperative society, filed a writ petition challenging an order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Expulsion of Founder Member from Cooperative Housing Society. Membership Cancellation Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 Upheld as Valid and in Accordance with Bye-Laws and Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Uttam Jagannath Lungare, a founder member of the Gurujan Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. (respondent No. 5), challenged his expulsion...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to SRA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. CEO's Direction to Process Letter of Intent Upheld as 70% Consent of Eligible Members Was Validly Obtained Under DCR 33(10).

The case involves a slum rehabilitation scheme under DCR 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai. The petitioners, Lokhandwal...