Search Results for "patta application"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "patta application"

187 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 187 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Encroachment Eviction Order — Plan-Marked Channel in Patta Land is Government Land Under RSO 26(15). The court upheld the concurrent findings of the authorities that the petitioner's construction of a pipeline and wall in a plan-marked channel constituted encroachment on government land, and no interference was warranted in writ jurisdiction.

24 Mar 2026

The petitioner, V.S. Ponnusamy, owned a land at Nallagoundanpalayam Village, Erode Taluk. A plan-marked channel was running through his patta land. Un...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Revision Petition Against Impleadment of Third Party in Suit for Injunction and Patta. Third Party Claiming Right of Way Over Government Poramboke Land Cannot Be Impleaded in Individual Capacity Without Showing Individual Interest.

4 Feb 2026

The petitioner filed a suit for bare injunction to restrain government officials from interfering with his possession and for a mandatory injunction d...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Application to Reopen Contempt Petition in Land Encroachment Case — Survey Conducted, Notices Issued, but Removal Deferred Due to Industrial Activity. Court declines to reopen contempt proceedings as substantial compliance with earlier order was shown and no wilful disobedience established.

9 Jan 2026

The case originated from a contempt petition (Cont.P.No.2923 of 2023) filed to punish respondents for wilful disobedience of an order dated 25.08.2023...

High Court

Madras High Court Considers Challenge to Tahsildar's Order Rejecting Patta Cancellation Application. Petitioner Alleged Non-consideration of Documents and Erroneous Reliance on Pending Civil Suit, Invoking Article 226.

19 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Anbazhagan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court see...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Revenue Authorities to Decide Patta Application Within 8 Weeks. Court Exercises Jurisdiction Under Article 226 to Command Tahsildar to Pass Final Orders on Pending Representation for Mutation of Revenue Records.

19 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Murugesan, purchased property situated in Survey No.105/6B, measuring 73.5 cents at A.Thekkur Village, Sivagangai District, through a ...

High Court

Madras High Court Considers Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus to Direct Cancellation of Patta. Petitioner Claims Absolute Ownership and Alleges Wrongful Inclusion of Private Respondents' Names in Revenue Records.

5 Mar 2025

The petitioner, S. James, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, seeking ...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Exclusion of Third Party Lands from Auction Sale in Company Liquidation — Official Liquidator Cannot Sell Properties Not Owned by Company. Applicants Established Title Through Patta and Chitta, Entitled to Exclusion Without Setting Aside Auction.

29 Jan 2025

The case involves multiple company applications filed by S. Mahendran and K. Singili (applicants) against the Official Liquidator and the Administrato...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Survey and Boundary Fixation for Petitioner's Property in Keeranur Village. Court Orders Revenue Authorities to Complete Survey Within Eight Weeks Based on Petitioner's Application.

7 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Mageswari, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus directing the respondents (District...

High Court

Madras High Court Partly Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Between Siblings — Declares Plaintiff's Title but Restricts Relief to RCC House Only. The court upheld the concurrent findings of the courts below that the plaintiff had proved his title and possession over the suit property, but modified the decree to exclude the thatched house from the relief, considering the plaintiff's admission.

2 Jan 2025

The second appeal arises from a property dispute between siblings. The plaintiff, Murugesan, filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction aga...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Forest Land Dispute — Non-Compliance of Section 114(A) Notice Not Fatal at Threshold Stage. Notice under Section 114(A) of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 is procedural and not a bar to maintainability of suit for declaration and injunction.

24 Nov 2021

The appellants, Sidramayya and Roopa, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)