Search Results for "partial conveyance"

105 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 105 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Cooperative Court's Order Terminating Lease for Violation of Bye-laws in Cooperative Housing Society Dispute. Leasehold rights terminated due to unauthorized construction and sub-letting without society's consent; purchasers' rights held subject to society's bye-laws.

The dispute pertains to leasehold rights over a plot in Vithalnagar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. The society granted a lease of the plot to membe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Due to Inadequate Compensation Assessment. Income Reassessed at Rs.6,000 Per Month with 40% Future Prospects and Multiplier of 16 Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Hareshwar Harischandra Mistry, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Tribunal's Compensation Award in Motor Accident Claim Case - High Court's Reduction of Functional Disability Percentage Without Cross-Appeal by Insurance Company Deemed Unjustified Under Order XLI Rule 33 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The dispute arose from a motor accident claim where the appellant, injured in a road traffic accident, sought compensation. The appellant, a 32-year-o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consent Decree Execution Dispute — Family Settlement Must Be Enforced to Give Fruits of Decree. Court Holds That Executing Court Cannot Nullify Consent Terms by Reading Implied Conditions; Direction Issued to Execute Letter of Allotment.

The dispute arose between two groups of family members, the PA Group (appellants) and the RA Group (respondents), over the assets of Kash Foods Privat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for Fracture of Spine and Ankle in Motor Accident Claim. Appellant sustained 35% permanent disability due to fracture of spine and right ankle; compensation enhanced from Rs.50,000 to Rs.1,00,000 under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Shri Paidal Kunhi Raman Nair, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injuri...