Search Results for "lokayukta"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "lokayukta"

322 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 322 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lokayukta Proceedings Initiated Without Jurisdiction in Political Pension Case. Complaint by Private Individual Regarding Political Pension Does Not Fall Within Definition of 'Complaint' Under Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984, Hence Upa-Lokayuktha Lacked Authority to Initiate Proceedings.

29 Nov 2024

The petitioner, Sri M.V. Srinivasa Gowda, an 85-year-old resident of Mandikal Village, Kolar District, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 22...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition by Karnataka Lokayukta Challenging KSAT Order Setting Aside Charge Memo. Enquiry Officer's Report Exonerating Employee of Misappropriation Upheld as Petition Withdrawn.

27 Oct 2022

The Karnataka Lokayukta filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Uncorroborated Trap Proceedings. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

13 Jan 2020

The appellant, M.C. Manjunatha, was convicted by the Principal Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Mysore, in Special Case No. 69/2004 for offences puni...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Acquits Police Officers in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was interested and independent witnesses turned hostile.

20 Sep 2019

The case involves two appeals by accused police officers (Ramaiah, Police Head Constable, and T.R. Hanumanthaiah, Police Sub-Inspector) against their ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows State and Lokayukta Petitions Challenging KAT Order — Lokayukta Investigation Under Section 12(3) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 Not Invalid for Non-Communication of Adverse Remarks. The Court held that Section 12(3) does not require prior communication of adverse remarks before ordering investigation, as it is only for ordering investigation and not for imposing punishment.

13 Sep 2019

The case involves two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The first petition was filed by the State of Karna...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition in Lokayukta Complaint Case — Section 8(1) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 Does Not Apply to Allegations. The court held that the Lokayukta's power under Section 8(1) is limited to grievances, not allegations, and quashed the Tribunal's order rejecting the petitioner's application.

9 Jan 2018

The petitioner, T.N. Raviprakash, a Second Division Surveyor with the Bangalore Development Authority, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 22...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction — Petitioner's disproportionate assets case quashed as investigation commenced without mandatory prior sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

14 Mar 2017

The petitioner, Sri Chandrashekhar Eligar, a Superintending Engineer in the PWD Department, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Co...

High Court

KAHC010300082015_1

27 Nov 2015

The appeal arose from the conviction of two public servants employed in the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (BWSSB) for demanding and accept...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Mining Case Due to Lack of Authorized Complaint Under MMDR Act. Deputy Superintendent of Police, Lokayukta Not Authorized Under Section 22 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 to Lodge Complaint.

10 Dec 2014

The petitioners, three individuals aged between 70 and 80 years, residents of Waddalur village, Raichur, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes KIC Order Directing Lokayukta to Disclose Asset Statements of MLAs/MLCs. Lokayukta Not a Public Authority Under RTI Act; Information Held in Fiduciary Capacity Exempt Under Section 8(1)(e).

3 Jan 2014

The petitioner, the Registrar of the Karnataka Lokayukta, challenged two orders of the Karnataka Information Commission (KIC) dated 8.9.2011 and 9.2.2...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)