Search Results for "interim rent"

736 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 736 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal by Temple Trust in Rent Recovery Suit Against Tenant. First Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside for Failure to Frame Proper Points and Perverse Findings.

The Plaintiff, Sri Veeraraghavaswamy Devasthanam, represented by its Honorary Agent, filed a suit for recovery of arrears of rent against the Defendan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree for Non-User and Subletting of Tenanted Shop. Tenant's Use of Premises as Godown for Grocery Items Held to Be Change of User and Subletting to Brother Constitutes Unauthorized Transfer.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the defendants (tenants) against a decree of eviction passed by the trial court and confirmed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition, Restores Eviction Decree in Sub-Lease Dispute for Breach of Covenant. Failure to pay municipal taxes and insurance premium constituted breach of condition under Section 111(g) of Transfer of Property Act, 1882, justifying forfeiture and eviction.

The petitioner, as lessor, had granted a sub-lease of land and buildings to the first respondent for 98 years. The sub-lease deed contained covenants ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Rent Control Eviction Case for Non-Payment of Arrears of Rent. Concurrent findings of default under Section 12(3)(a) of Bombay Rent Act upheld as no perversity shown.

The petitioners, tenants of a room admeasuring 8'x10' owned by the respondent-landlord, were in possession since long at a monthly rent of Rs. 15/-. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Restoration Applications in Eviction Disputes Due to Failure to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance. Order IX Rule 9 CPC Requires Satisfactory Explanation for Absence, Which Was Not Provided.

The judgment pertains to a group of civil applications filed by Lekhraj M. Solanki and Jasoda Lekhraj Solanki, the original plaintiffs, seeking restor...