Search Results for "infrastructure fee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "infrastructure fee"

281 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 281 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Industrial Plot Lease Forfeiture Case, Upholding UPSIDA's Cancellation Order. The forfeiture was justified due to breach of construction timelines under the lease agreement, and the High Court's refusal to interfere under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was correct as the dispute was contractual in nature.

6 Apr 2026

The appeal arose from a dispute over the forfeiture of an industrial plot lease by the Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Authority (UPSIDA). ...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case, Holding Legal Fees and Lenders Agency Fees as 'Interest' Under Section 2(28A) Eligible for Exemption Under Section 10(23G) of Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court restored the CIT(A)'s order allowing exemption for fees charged for documentation in connection with long term finance.

20 Jan 2026

The appellant, M/s IDFC Limited, filed a Tax Case Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order dated 28.09.2012 of the Inc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tilaknagar's Injunction Claim in Trademark Passing Off Dispute Over MANSION HOUSE and SAVOY CLUB. Court Holds That 1987 Agreements Ceding Trademarks Were Conditional and Revocable, and Tilaknagar Failed to Establish Exclusive Ownership.

7 Feb 2025

The judgment arises from a commercial IPR suit involving a counterclaim by Tilaknagar Industries Ltd. (Tilaknagar) against Herman Jansen Beverages Ned...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Election Symbols Order for Local Body Elections. The Court held that the State Election Commission's order restricting use of national party symbols in local body elections was not ultra vires the Constitution and was within its rule-making power under Article 243K.

20 Oct 2023

The petitioners, including Minakshi Traders, Harish Bajaj, and Nagpur Tent House Association, filed writ petitions challenging an order dated 10.08.20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Licensors in Leave and Licence Disputes Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court holds that termination of licence agreements and recovery of possession are arbitrable disputes warranting interim protection to prevent irretrievable injustice.

20 Aug 2022

The judgment concerns three arbitration petitions filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by licensors seeking interim me...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by ITAT. Tribunal's order set aside for failing to consider the TPO's detailed analysis and rejecting comparables without proper reasoning under Section 92C of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

27 Feb 2020

The appeal was filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - 6 under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appe...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Rule 4(2)(a) of Karnataka Pre-University Education Rules, 2006 Requiring Prior Approval for Opening New Pre-University Colleges. Education Trust's Challenge Dismissed as Rule is Valid and Not Ultra Vires.

28 Nov 2019

The appellant, Chetana Education Trust, an education trust established to provide education to children in Karnataka, had established 13 pre-universit...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging APMC Market Fee Exemption for Farmers. Exemption notification under Section 63 of Karnataka APMC Act, 1966 held valid and not violative of Article 14.

19 Jul 2018

The petitioners, who are traders and commission agents in the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) yard at Tiptur, filed a Public Interest Lit...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Excise License Fee Hike — License Fee Enhancement for CL-2, CL-7, and CL-9 Licenses Upheld as Valid Exercise of Power Under Section 17 of Karnataka Excise Act, 1965. Court Held That the Fee Is a Privilege Fee and Not a Tax, and the Government's Policy Decision Is Not Arbitrary.

24 Jun 2014

The petitioners, who are holders of CL-2, CL-7, and CL-9 excise licenses for retail sale of liquor and bars/restaurants in Hubli and Gadag districts, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Alleging Misuse of Public Funds by Educational Trust and Trustees — No Prima Facie Case of Mala Fides or Violation of Government Resolutions Established. The court held that the petitioner failed to provide specific evidence of diversion of fees or misappropriation, and the trust had complied with the fee regulation committee's directions under the Government Resolution dated 24-09-2003.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Shri Balasaheb Baburao Jambulkar, an ex-freedom fighter and social worker, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) under Article 226 ...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)